On 3/4/2019 10:11 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
... The fix should be either compiling
Bacula with the correct headers or else file a bug report with Zyxel.
Or to use plain accept() and call fcntl() with CLOEXEC. As I understand
it, there can be a race condition if you fire off your
On 3/4/2019 10:00 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
I think the problem is that accept4 might be defined in libc, but not
implemented in the kernel. Hence it will be detected by configure but will
fail at run time.
The code could be improved by calling accept if accept4 fails at run time,
i.e.
In a Linux server (Centos 7), would the volumes need to be un-mounted to
back them up with Bacula? I am looking for a solution that would allow me
to back up while the server is working without disturbing any activities
that may be ongoing. We run web applications, databases, cron jobs, etc
Debian packages for Bacula 9.4.2 are available since few weeks already.
Best regards
Davide
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 08:43, Petar Kozic wrote:
> Hi folks,
> can we expect dpkg packets for Debian like OS ?
>
> Thank you.
>
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing
I think the problem is that accept4 might be defined in libc, but not
implemented in the kernel. Hence it will be detected by configure but will
fail at run time.
The code could be improved by calling accept if accept4 fails at run time,
i.e. something like
#ifdef HAVE_ACCEPT4
fd =
Thank you very much !
On March 4, 2019 at 1:50:48 PM, Jose Alberto (j.se...@gmail.com) wrote:
Bacula 9.4.2 Debian 9. But, you put repository stretch-backport
https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/bacula-server
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:42 AM Petar Kozic wrote:
> Hi folks,
> can
On 3/3/2019 12:52 PM, Peter Milesson wrote:
Hi folks,
I did some testing during the weekend.
* When backing up a huge file (> 10GB), the Windows transfer rate is
comparable to the Linux transfer rate (32 Mb/s).
Yes. This is why I suspect the problem lies in NTFS, not in network
Bacula 9.4.2 Debian 9. But, you put repository stretch-backport
https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/bacula-server
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:42 AM Petar Kozic wrote:
> Hi folks,
> can we expect dpkg packets for Debian like OS ?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
abort() is not portable -- it behaves differently on different systems.
A segfault is portable, so we use have used it for 20 years now, and it
works fine. Use abort() at your own risk.
On 3/4/19 8:35 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
> On 2019-03-01 23:00, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am
Sorry if I have not followed this whole thread, but the command you want
to do is:
lsscsi -g
The control device names are listed in the last column. The control
device name is needed by mtx to actuate the autochanger. The control
device name is also needed for some of the tape alert commands.
10 matches
Mail list logo
