On Tuesday 2019-04-16 14:29:32 Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
> On 4/16/19 1:22 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > The usual way to do it is a shared storage.
> > Servers would need to be able to connect to the storage and see the
> > exported LUN over fibre channel, iSCSI or similar protocol.
>
On 4/16/19 1:22 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> The usual way to do it is a shared storage.
> Servers would need to be able to connect to the storage and see the
> exported LUN over fibre channel, iSCSI or similar protocol.
And what I was saying is that at this point DRBD would be very low on my
list
On Tuesday 2019-04-16 12:40:02 Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
> On 4/16/19 10:04 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> > NFS and DRBD are not really comparable that way.
>
> The easy way you migrate a running VM from one host to another is to
> have the image on an NFS mounted on both hosts.
Yes, t
On Tuesday 2019-04-16 12:28:45 Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
> On 4/16/19 10:27 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> > Running jobs will fail, but the automated "Reschedule On Error"
> > feature
> > allows restarting them after the fail-over. Also, fail-over doesn't
> > affect scheduled jobs that have
Not sure how this happened:
> The easy way you migrate a running from one host to another VM is have
-- it was meant to be "a running VM from one host to another".
8-\ boggle
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description
On 4/16/19 10:04 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> NFS and DRBD are not really comparable that way.
The easy way you migrate a running from one host to another VM is have
the image on an NFS mounted on both hosts.
The hard way involves copying the actual image file, however, if you use
ZFS you may get
On 4/16/19 10:27 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Running jobs will fail, but the automated "Reschedule On Error" feature
> allows restarting them after the fail-over. Also, fail-over doesn't
> affect scheduled jobs that haven't started yet at the time of fail-over.
> Putting the OS on DRBD and runni
On Tuesday 2019-04-16 11:27:54 Josh Fisher wrote:
> On 4/16/2019 10:45 AM, Dmitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
> > I would put everything out of drbd volume because quite frankly I
> > don't
> > see the point. I don't think you can fail over in a middle of a
> > backup,
> > and without that, why
Josip DeanovicOn Tuesday 2019-04-16 17:27:48 wrote:
> On Tuesday 2019-04-16 12:13:55 Heitor Faria wrote:
> > Speaking of Bacula HA, I've been deploying a scenario with relative
> > success. Primary Director & SD have copy jobs routines to a Secondary
> > Remote SD that also has an independent work
On Tuesday 2019-04-16 12:13:55 Heitor Faria wrote:
> Speaking of Bacula HA, I've been deploying a scenario with relative
> success. Primary Director & SD have copy jobs routines to a Secondary
> Remote SD that also has an independent working Director. Both director
> can access the Secondary SD. An
On 4/16/2019 10:45 AM, Dmitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:24:10 -0300
Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote:
5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so
would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM
has frequently crashing what
Hello All,
>> 5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so
>> would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM
>> has frequently crashing what makes me think that excessive writing on
>> the disk may be impacting the OS)
>
> I would put everything out
On Tuesday 2019-04-16 09:45:29 Dmitri Maziuk via Bacula-users wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:24:10 -0300
>
> Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote:
> > 5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so
> > would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM
> > has fre
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:24:10 -0300
Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote:
> 5. Currently the OS and Backup disks are on the same DRBD volume, so
> would it be better to put the OS disk out of the DRBD volume? (the VM
> has frequently crashing what makes me think that excessive writing on
> the disk may be
On 4/15/2019 10:50 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
On 16/04/2019 12:24, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote:
...
2. Is there any restriction on mounting the Bacula VM on a DRBD
volume in the hypervisor. In this VM I will implement ZFS
deduplication for my backups?
I /think/ you are asking if Bacula ca
Marcio Demetrio Bacci kirjoitti 16.4.2019 5:24:
I have some doubts about Bacula, however I did not find answers on the
Internet or in the books for the following doubts:
1. Is there any problem in using Bacula virtualized? (I didn't find
anything saying otherwise)
I run my Bacula server as
16 matches
Mail list logo
