Re: [Bacula-users] Windows client compatible with Bacula 9.0.6

2020-03-20 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 21/03/2020 03:30, Shawn Rappaport wrote: Hi, I'm running Bacula 9.0.6 on CentOS 7.5 (Director and SDs). I'm looking for a copy of the Windows binary for Windows Server 2016 that will work with that version of Bacula. I tried downloading the 9.0.8 binary from this location but the link on tha

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 2020-03-20 04:35, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a set of tapes that I'd like to use in a daily rotation to backup > online disk volumes to tape. > > I defined a pool for this like so: > > Pool { > Name = offline_weekly > Pool Type = Backup > Recycle = yes > AutoPrune =

[Bacula-users] Windows client compatible with Bacula 9.0.6

2020-03-20 Thread Shawn Rappaport
Hi, I'm running Bacula 9.0.6 on CentOS 7.5 (Director and SDs). I'm looking for a copy of the Windows binary for Windows Server 2016 that will work with that version of Bacula. I tried downloading the 9.0.8 binary from this location but the link on that page is no longer valid (I get a 404): http

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape Moving Error after server restart

2020-03-20 Thread Martin Simmons
Did the restart happen in the middle of a backup? Does the backup error occur after you unmount the tape from bconole, eject it and then insert and mount it again, without rebooting? __Martin > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:52:09 +0100 (CET), Christian Lehmann said: > > Dear all, > > from time

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 22:33:10 +1100, Gary R Schmidt said: > > On 20/03/2020 22:21, Heitor Faria wrote: > > Hello Uwe, > > > > No, it is not. > > VUD will change the volume status to used at its endpoint, making sure > > the VolRetention is applied. > > Bacula volumes selection algo always t

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 20/03/2020 22:21, Heitor Faria wrote: Hello Uwe, No, it is not. VUD will change the volume status to used at its endpoint, making sure the VolRetention is applied. Bacula volumes selection algo always try to write on last written tape. The only when to implement the round-robin tape rotatio

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Josh Fisher
On 3/20/2020 4:35 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: Hi folks, I have a set of tapes that I'd like to use in a daily rotation to backup online disk volumes to tape. I defined a pool for this like so: Pool { Name = offline_weekly Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello Uwe, No, it is not. VUD will change the volume status to used at its endpoint, making sure the VolRetention is applied. Bacula volumes selection algo always try to write on last written tape. The only when to implement the round-robin tape rotation you want is using different pools for eac

[Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.x: "volume use duration" not working as expected

2020-03-20 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, I have a set of tapes that I'd like to use in a daily rotation to backup online disk volumes to tape. I defined a pool for this like so: Pool { Name = offline_weekly Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 1 year Recycle Oldest Volume = yes Pu