Re: [Bacula-users] waiting on max Job jobs - not cancelled?

On 01/04/2020 16:10, Bernie Elbourn wrote: Oddly, jobs run sequentially as follows rather than duplicates being cancelled: Running Jobs: Console connected at 29-Mar-20 12:36  JobId  Type Level Files Bytes  Name  Status

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

Bacula DOES NOT LIKE and does not handle network interruptions _at all_ if backups are in progress. This _will_ cause backups to abort - and these aborted backups are _not_ resumable Hi, My feeble two cents is that this has been a bit of an Achilles heel for us even though we are a LAN backup

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Client-initiated backup communications problem

I wanted to give this a bump, because with more of my users working off-site due to COVID-19 the lack of client-initiated backups has become a major issue. I think the main question I have is, does *anyone* have client-initiated backups working in a situation where the client has a dynamic IP?

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

Hello Alan, >>> Bacula DOES NOT LIKE and does not handle network interruptions _at all_ >>> if backups are in progress. This _will_ cause backups to abort - and >>> these aborted backups are _not_ resumable I wonder if anyone has ever tried changing the tcp_retries values on Linux and how they

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

On 27/05/2020 15:13, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > On 27/05/2020 23:17, Alan Brown wrote: >> >> >> >> Bacula DOES NOT LIKE and does not handle network interruptions _at all_ >> if backups are in progress. This _will_ cause backups to abort - and >> these aborted backups are _not_ resumable >> >>

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

On 27/05/2020 23:17, Alan Brown wrote: I've been running Bacula for ~15 years (community/enterprise) and have identified a few areas which are in desperate of improvement: For an "enterprise" grade backup system, it's amazingly fragile in a few areas (particularly in actual Enterprise

[Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

I've been running Bacula for ~15 years (community/enterprise) and have identified a few areas which are in desperate of improvement: For an "enterprise" grade backup system, it's amazingly fragile in a few areas (particularly in actual Enterprise networks!) Bacula DOES NOT LIKE and does not

Re: [Bacula-users] Update via rpm repository

Ok thanks for your input, I surely will be looking into it! Best regards, Luca Il giorno mer 27 mag 2020 alle ore 12:10 Per Qvindesland ha scritto: > Hi Luca > > TO be honest I have no idea if it’s the same packages as bacula has on > their site or not, but I been using his repo for a long

Re: [Bacula-users] PHP exception for restores after retention period

Hello Marcin, Thank you very much for all your help, and for creating a feature request. Kind regards, Yakup Kaya From: Marcin Haba Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 5:58 AM To: Yakup Kaya Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Markus Flaisch Subject: Re:

Re: [Bacula-users] Recommendation for NAS Appliance that Supports Bacula Community

On 2020-05-26 19:10, J W wrote: I want to run Bacula Director on the NAS rather than mounting the NAS storage on the server and running Director on the server so that if something goes wrong and overwrites everything on the server then it does not overwrite the NAS as well. Any suggestions?