Hi,
I've no doubt I will be referred to some part of the manual that I
missed ;).
But I have had a problem for some time now and done nothing about it.
If a job takes long enough to cause subsequent job(s) to fail with start wait
time exceeded.
(Fatal error: Job cancelled because max
Hi All,
whilst still waiting for some responses to my earlier query having
sympathy for the guy who lost it and emptied his bowels onto a mailing list -
to be recorded for posterity (to his ovious subsequent regret!), these things
happen to us all sometimes.
I think it would be nice
case: 1.38.11 and 2.0.2.
You are apparently missing the new Autochanger resource introduced in
1.38.x, which is required.
On Monday 05 March 2007 13:56, Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi,
Solaris 9 (sun4u) bacula-2.0.2 (recently upgraded from 1.36.1)
[Mysql 4.0.21 Solaris 8,9,10, Linux 2.6
Hi,
Solaris 9 (sun4u) bacula-2.0.2 (recently upgraded from 1.36.1)
[Mysql 4.0.21 Solaris 8,9,10, Linux 2.6 (FC5 GENTOO), WIN-32 (WIN-XP)
Clients.]
- Bacula built from source.
- Director Storage Daemon on same machine.
- Storage device LTO STOREDGE-L8 Autochanger (Actually an HP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Brennen wrote:
That's what I get for working with things I don't fully
understand. :)
Heh... working with things I don't fully understand is the story of
my life.
That's it that's just Brilliant
That is the precise inscription I want on my
17:44, Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi All,
Solaris 9 (sun4u) Bacula-1.36.1 working (worked!) fine - upgrading
to bacula-2.0.2. [Mysql 4.0.21 Solaris 8,9,10, Linux 2.6 (FC5
GENTOO), WIN-32 (WIN-XP) Clients.]
(Bacula built from source).
Upgrading initially just the backup server
Hi All,
Solaris 9 (sun4u) Bacula-1.36.1 working (worked!) fine - upgrading to
bacula-2.0.2.
[Mysql 4.0.21 Solaris 8,9,10, Linux 2.6 (FC5 GENTOO), WIN-32 (WIN-XP)
Clients.]
(Bacula built from source).
Upgrading initially just the backup server -
comprising director on a dedicated
Hi,
I know I am a little late with this comment and it is probably not
welcome... But I feel it needs stating
...RANT...
I am not happy with the client-specific gui (bat).
It would surely be better to have a server based gui run from a web-browser -
what I had hoped bacula-web would
-Original Message-
From: Michel Meyers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 January 2007 12:39PM
To: Andrew Paterson
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Admin Tool (bat)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ger Apeldoorn wrote:
Perhaps you
Yes,
I've had this happen to me on at least one ocasion I beleive it
ultimately amounts to the director (I think)
running out of memory.
I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but it looks to me like bacula builds its file tree
in memory if so, then well thats just asking for trouble isnt it - I
Harry,
I can confidently say that in this business, its not what you know
that's important but
how quickly you can learn something new.
From what you've said, you obviously don't have anything to worry about on
that score!
Regards
Andrew R Paterson
DS Ltd.
Cedar Office Park
Cobham
Been there... Done that!
In the FileSet specification (before the Include directive) add the followig
directive
Ignore FileSet Changes = Yes
Regards
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael
Dauer
Sent: 06 September 2005 9:46AM
To:
Hi All,
Is it allowable in bacula-dir.conf to have one 'JobDefs' directive
referencing another one?
(I'm trying to tidy up my config files remove some of th duplication).
Regards
Andrew R Paterson
DS Ltd.
Cedar Office Park
Cobham Road
Ferndown
Dorset BH21 7SB
Tel: +44 (0) 1202 877188
Best Regards
Andrew Paterson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Lehmann
Sent: 08 June 2005 21:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Trying to use Bacula-web
Hello,
[EMAIL
Title: Bacula-Client only on Solaris 2.5.1
Yes.
g++ (gcc)
3.3.1
Minor changes are
needed to fix copmilation errors regarding the non-definition of gethostid() and
gethostname().
They are pretty
easy tio fix.
However, I only
built the client (my director runs on Solaris 9!) I beleive
Yes
I
have it working (on Solaris 9 linux) and it is a really good piece of
software.
Its easy to get working on
linux, solaris is another matter.
You shouldn't need to do
any moves (try a copy next time) since you are just asking to break something
else doing that!
Also if you get your
Yes yes ... DDS are crap!!
The trouble is that I for one (on my home systems) find it very handy that
DDS are crap - I tend to be able to acquire drives tapes that are about to be
thrown out!!!
:) that is probably why we have so many people using them right now!
Andrew R Paterson
Systems
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Andrew Paterson
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-1.36.3 oddity
On Thursday 02 June 2005 10:37, Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi list,
having successfully upgraded from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3
(or at least it appears successful so far(!))
I have an initial query regarding
: 17 May 2005 10:02AM
To: Andrew Paterson
Cc: Bacula-Users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3
Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi,
I am considering upgrading from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3 and am (double!)
checking the required DB updates.
It appears that the Database
Hi,
I am considering upgrading from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3 and am (double!)
checking the required DB updates.
It appears that the Database schema follows its own versioning independent of
the bacula source code
(seems sensible).
I conclude that I am running a Version 7 database schema (select
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 May 2005 10:13AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Andrew Paterson
Subject: Re: FW: [Bacula-users] Subject : eBay Security Center
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 10:03, Andrew Paterson wrote:
You ask what spam.
this kind of spam - I for one am registered in many mailing lists
Hi,
I have been running Bacula 1.34.6 on WIN-XP, Solaris 2.6/7/8/9/10
(client only on XP 2.6) for approximately a year now.
What can I say ... I'm very fond of it :)
However, I have a feeling I should upgrade to a newer version now - why? -
(ummm! just a feeling in the ol' bones
Hi,
I have been running Bacula 1.34.6 on WIN-XP, Solaris 2.6/7/8/9/10
(client only on XP 2.6) for approximately a year now.
What can I say ... I'm very fond of it :)
However, I have a feeling I should upgrade to a newer version now - why? -
(ummm! just a feeling in the ol' bones
Paterson
-Original Message-
From: Arno Lehmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2005 21:08
To: Andrew Paterson
Cc: Bacula-Users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading live system from Bacula 1.34.6 to
current stable release
Hello,
Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi,
I have
You
ask what spam.
this
kind of spam - I for one am registered in many mailing lists, yet I only receive
this stuff from Bacula-users.
It is
very irritating
Andy
Paterson
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
eBaySent: 04 April
Hi all,
can anyone confirm that the IgnoreFileSets directive is supported in
V1.34.6 please.
I get :
bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at parse_conf.c:768
Config error: Keyword IgnoreFileSetChanges not permitted in this resource.
Perhaps you left the trailing brace off of the previous
26 matches
Mail list logo
