d 2000 OK RunBeforeNow , got 2905 Bad RunBeforeNow
command.
Seems bacula is trying to run "prune expired volume yes" as shell
command, but as I understand from the docs this command should run
as bacula console command on the director.
For the test I added additi
nformation in database about 1,365,074 files.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
M
Maximum Volumes = 100
Maximum Volume Jobs = 1
Label Format = "Full-"
File Retention = 1 week
Job Retention = 1 year
Storage = File
}
Jobs seems running in parallel. Can you told me if such setup is OK?
--
]; then
echo - Volume $i is damaged
echo $OUTPUT
fi
done
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https
Is it fixed in newer versions? Currently I'm using 5.2.6.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https
=5201271d
What can I use on regular basis to ensure that bacula still can read
volume? Unfortunately verify job checks only the last job but data
corruption could happen later.
Thanks in advance.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
Features in bacula documentation.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula
, but
found no error. e2fsck checks only filesystem metadata consistency but
not data. So errors inside volume files (uncorrectable bit errors as
example) will be not found by this tool.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
like zfs/btrfs could solve such problem on system level. I do not
remember if raid5/6 protect from situation when disk read operation
return incorrect data without error.
--
WBR, Andrey Tataranovich
