hi
if i set FileRetention to something low like 2 weeks and i have full
backups done once every 3 months, file records from the full backup will
be gone sooner than the next full backup. will this affect the
incremental, differential backups that will be done after the first 2 weeks?
how is D
hi,
same problem here using a dell tape drive, not sure of specifics right
now because its on a remote server but i can ask for them
did you find any fix to this? i can do those rectest and write a label
ok, but others fail
btape runs as root, should be ok, also bacula is in the tape group
il
b line for your job thats
> not running.
>
> Also try this-
> update slots
>
> because if you look at the media status, bacula doesn't think that
> this volume is in the changer. InChanger is 0
>
> -Aaron
>
> Dragos Gheorghe wrote:
>>
>> not reall
from a week or so (a full and
incremental backups worth)
Aaron Knister wrote:
> Could you post your sd and dir configs? I think I know what the
> problem is.
>
>
>
> Dragos Gheorghe wrote:
>>
>> not really
>>
>> *add pool=bacula-pool-tape-incremental
>
/pool name/ storage=bacula-device-tape-ibm-ultrium-ct2-id01
>
> then when prompted enter the volume name of the tape which I think is
> B0
>
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem at hand. I'm still not using
> bacula version 2.0
>
> Dragos Gheorghe
0 | Backup
| * |
++---+-+-+--++
Aaron Knister wrote:
> What does a list pool show?
>
> Dragos Gheorghe wrote:
>> my setup worked ok both on scheduled jobs
my setup worked ok both on scheduled jobs and bconsole run command,
until today and for a couple of months now (on bacula 2 from 2 weeks)
im working on Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) i686-pc-linux-gnu redhat
compiled from source on centos 4
i think the problem started from canceling a label co
