ention) as
you've already figured by running visudo and inspecting the contents.
Without any more specific data (hint: check your syslog files, it should
be very specific in there,) it'll be nearly impossible for anybody to even
hazard a guess as to why it's failing, or even what it'
rily a simple
task.
In short, I don't think Bacula is what you're looking for, considering
that you'd like the client to be more than trivially involved.
Jeff Kalchik
--
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Re
broken, and it's been sent out to the bot farms. Forum
operators have to stay on top of this, and long-term, it'll be nothing but
an arms race. Forums and listservs share a lot in their spam detectors.
It's not enough to bar access, at least
what it's worth, I'm the back end administrator for a North American
4wd club/site. The site sees a few thousand visitors a day, as well as
quite a few posts.
Re: spam posts. The site I administer had a severe
t; Two disks in raid 0 for spooling, and recovering
> Three or more disks in raid 5 for the sd storage.
>
> Thoughts or comments on this?
*NEVER* use software RAID if you can avoid it. Software RAID puts
> This system has had a history of problems, particularly scsi problems.
Unfortunately, I'd suspect that this is the real source of your problems.
Until you have a stable SCSI bus, anything sent down it is suspect. I
wouldn't even be sure the data got written to tape.
Jeff "who's fighting loade
, the length of time is probably more due to the
EMC BCV cloning process, but the entire database is consistent, and whole
backups are possible.
If you're hosting your databases on a hardware SAN, this might be another
option.
Jeff Kalchik
--
ng
> any of these.
FWIW, I have a system here at home (openSuSE 11.0, Ultra160 disk shelf, 5
180gb disks in a RAID5 LUN under mdadm control.) I don't see that sort of
delay anywhere in the filesystems on that LUN.
Jeff Kalchik
---
Good morning, Bjoern, et al.
I'm running openSuSE 10.0 and 10.2 machines. I thought I'd built using
termcap on the 10.2 machines, checking YAST2, shows that I didn't have
termcap installed. Running YAST2/Software Management, termcap installs
easily on 10.2. After installation, I see /usr/lib/li
es for).
Here's a leading question for you, John.
The folks here at my day job run Veritas Netbackup for the Windows
servers, specifically for the Bare Metal Recovery aspect. Can you
compare, and contrast, Bacula&#x
> Hello,
>
> I have just released the source tar and Win32 binary files for Bacula beta
> 2.1.30 to the Source Forge bacula-beta release area. As I mentioned in a
> previous email, other than a bit more documentation, I don't expect this
> code
> to change between now and this weekend when version
> El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 14:38 -0500, Jeff Kalchik escribió:
>
>
>
>> on RAID5 volumes. I pointed out that his high performance database had
>> been running on a RAID5 (hardware implementation over Fibre Channel)
>> volume set for 6 months.
>
> With a
well
on RAID5 volumes. I pointed out that his high performance database had
been running on a RAID5 (hardware implementation over Fibre Channel)
volume set for 6 months.
My point is that there are always alternatives. Speed co
single user mode operation, where none of the other
volumes may be mounted or available. This really isn't an error, but it
is letting you know that you do need to address the situation by either
including these other mountpoints in include directives, or by using onefs
(as
At 06:24 AM 4/12/2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> > I discovered something odd this weekend during my home networks
> > normal scheduled full backups
> > The issue I ran into is in the next volume selection
> > logic. Thursday, I made sure that I cycled tapes in that were ready
> > to be recycled o
ntirely possible that I've got a bad configuration
somewhere. Rather than chew up bandwidth with the email, see
http://70.101.157.224/bacula.tgz for my configuration files and the
last few lines of bacula.log showing the error messages.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Jeff Kalchik
16 matches
Mail list logo
