Re: **Possibile SPAM**Re: **Possibile SPAM**[Bacula-users] Restore files

2005-11-30 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
I am sorry Kern, but by backup job was already recycled (I have no space for more than 3 full backups on the disk storage, and using incremental or differential changes only some percent of space, because the system contains mastly huge mail notes databases, which are changed continuously). The

Re: **Possibile SPAM**Re: **Possibile SPAM**[Bacula-users] Restore files

2005-11-28 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
Hi Kern, I should have thought that some practical problem was forcing to use read blocks. Maybe it is a silly idea, but do you think volumes could be matched with subdirs in disk storage and files inside them matched with files in tape volumes? I imagine this would be an enormous (and tedious)

Re: **Possibile SPAM**Re: **Possibile SPAM**[Bacula-users] Restore files

2005-11-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 28 November 2005 19:18, Ferdinando Pasqualetti wrote: Hi Kern, I should have thought that some practical problem was forcing to use read blocks. Maybe it is a silly idea, but do you think volumes could be matched with subdirs in disk storage and files inside them matched with files