Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-08 Thread Reinier Haasjes
Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend. I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the result is as follow: -bash-2.05b$ time echo restore jobid=1553,1561,1576,1598,1607,1617 |bconsole Connecting to Director tapeserver:9101 1000 OK: tapeserver-dir Version: 1.37.30 (14 July

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
To answer your question, you will need to do some timing. See below. On Monday 08 August 2005 09:37, Reinier Haasjes wrote: Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend. I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the result is as follow: -bash-2.05b$ time echo restore

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-08 Thread Reinier Haasjes
Hi all, Kern Sibbald wrote: To answer your question, you will need to do some timing. See below. On Monday 08 August 2005 09:37, Reinier Haasjes wrote: Hi, sorry for the late reply, weekend. I did the test again like you did it (with the time command) and the result is as follow:

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I just did a restore on a 400MHz PII with 250MB main memory that was in the process of completing my nightly backups. That is to say, it was pretty busy already. From the restore command until the tree prompt it took 1 minute 43 seconds. This was for something like 475,000 files.

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-08 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Reinier Haasjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Thomas Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time Hello, I just did a restore on a 400MHz

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-05 Thread drescher0110-bacula
Hi, I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I decided to test a full server recovery. I discovered that the building the directory tree takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836 files. I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at 12:15 I got a prompt. The

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-05 Thread Reinier Haasjes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I decided to test a full server recovery. I discovered that the building the directory tree takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836 files. I started the building of the tree at 11:20 and at 12:15 I got a

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-05 Thread drescher0110-bacula
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm using bacula 1.37.30 for a few days now and I decided to test a full server recovery. I discovered that the building the directory tree takes a very long time (almost an hour) for 429,836 files. I started the building of the tree at 11:20

Re: [Bacula-users] [1.37.30] Recover takes long time

2005-08-05 Thread Thomas Simmons
That seems pretty slow to me. I just did a test and it took 10 seconds to build the tree for ~400,000 files. Like you, I too have an opteron system, a dual 246 w 1/GB ram, however I keep the database on a set of mirrored sata disks on the local server. Have you tried installing the database on