On Sunday 27 September 2009 19:00:38 Bill Merriam wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently several email design threads have pointed out an important
> > deficiency in the Bacula project that I would like to discuss. We (I) I
> > have already designed (mostly in my head) a good numb
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments or ideas on this?
Anything that can record and make available the design process and the
resulting documents is very useful. First, people can see why and how
things are designed the way they are. We can see why the software acts
the way it
On Saturday 26 September 2009 19:45:02 Reynier Pérez Mira wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > We have mostly worked around these problems by strongly encouraging
> > potential developers to read the Developers Guide posted on
> > www.bacula.org. It pretty much covers all the points necessary to ensur
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> We have mostly worked around these problems by strongly encouraging potential
> developers to read the Developers Guide posted on www.bacula.org. It pretty
> much covers all the points necessary to ensure that code submissions are
> accepted. The problem is that not every
On Saturday 26 September 2009 10:38:07 Blake Dunlap wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently several email design threads have pointed out an important
> > deficiency
> > in the Bacula project that I would like to discuss. We (I) I have already
> > designed (mostly in my head) a good number of future pro
>
> Hello,
>
> Recently several email design threads have pointed out an important
> deficiency
> in the Bacula project that I would like to discuss. We (I) I have already
> designed (mostly in my head) a good number of future projects -- including
> how to support portable clients better, deleting
