-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it
myself.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Dan Langille wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it (particularly
Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it myself. However, in
that case, I am condering not making the binaries available on Source Forge,
but on some other site
On Monday 16 July 2007 13:28, Alan Brown wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Dan Langille wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly
Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it myself. However,
in
that case, I am condering not making the
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I hate to say this, but history shows that it usually leads to a great
deal of shouting and hatemail from the peanut gallery.
Kern, how many hours/how much cost is involved in validating the Win*
binaries?
This was actually a genuine question. We
On Monday 16 July 2007 18:08, Alan Brown wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I hate to say this, but history shows that it usually leads to a great
deal of shouting and hatemail from the peanut gallery.
Well, I am not too worried about the shouting from the peanut gallery. I
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it (particularly
Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it myself. However, in
that case, I am condering not making the binaries available on Source Forge,
but on some
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it
myself. However, in that case, I am condering not making the
On 7/12/07 7:56 AM, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it
On 12 Jul 2007 at 8:42, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
Does this mean that Debian packages would be dropped since it would
not be 'free' to distribute the binaries? I'm not an expert on legality
issues, so please help clear my understanding.
AFAIK, and I don't mind being corrected on this, anyone can
On Thursday 12 July 2007 16:36, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
(particularly Vista, Vista
11 matches
Mail list logo
