On Thursday 31 March 2011 16:24:46 Josh Fisher wrote:
On 3/30/2011 5:05 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your feature request. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to
implement it, so unless you can provide some new insight, it will not
help adding it to the projects file.
On 4/4/2011 1:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2011 16:24:46 Josh Fisher wrote:
On 3/30/2011 5:05 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your feature request. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to
implement it, so unless you can provide some new insight, it will not
On 3/30/2011 5:05 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for your feature request. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to
implement it, so unless you can provide some new insight, it will not help
adding it to the projects file.
This can be done with a software transactional memory (STM)
Hello,
This sounds like a nice feature.
In the mean time, you could probably script this by having two different
bconsole.conf files, one for each director, then call a script that takes the
Director name and then executes bconsole with the correct conf file.
File bcon:
#!/bin/sh
Hello,
Le mercredi 14 juillet 2010 16:20:18, Olaf Zevenboom a écrit :
Item x (new): add the ability to pass a director-name to bconsole on start
of bconsole Date: 14 july 2010
Origin: Olaf Zevenboom (olaf at artefact dot nl)
Status:
This feature has been implemented few months ago in the
Hello,
Although it would be useful to have vacation schedules directly in Bacula,
your Feature Request doesn't explain in a way that can be implemented what
you really want as there is no common definition of what a holiday/vacation
and you do not specify how this should be handled.
In
On Monday 29 March 2010 12:48:14 James Harper wrote:
In addition, one should take care in using multipe disk Devices that
write to
the same physical disk drive. Depending how you set it up and how
many you
have, you may create severe disk fragmentation and performance
problems.
I
On Friday 13 March 2009 19:24:47 Landon Fuller wrote:
On Feb 16, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
Feature Request Form
Item n: Storage Daemon based encryption
Origin: Steve Polyack korvus at comcast dot net
Date: 16 February 2009
Status: new
What: The ability
On Friday 13 March 2009 13:00:37 Graham Keeling wrote:
Hello,
Here is a feature request.
Item n: 'restore' menu: enter a JobId, automatically select dependents
Origin: Graham Keeling (gra...@equiinet.com)
Date: 13 March 2009
Status: Proposing
What: Add to the bconsole 'restore' menu
On Friday 13 March 2009 13:00:37 Graham Keeling wrote:
Hello,
Here is a feature request.
Item n: 'restore' menu: enter a JobId, automatically select dependents
Origin: Graham Keeling (gra...@equiinet.com)
Date: 13 March 2009
Status: Proposing
What: Add to the bconsole 'restore' menu
On Feb 16, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
Feature Request Form
Item n: Storage Daemon based encryption
Origin: Steve Polyack korvus at comcast dot net
Date: 16 February 2009
Status: new
What: The ability to encrypt and decrypt data that moves between
the storage
Hello,
I think what you are asking for is probably a much bigger issue than you might
imagine. Hopefully what follows will give a rough overview the issues.
The scheme you are suggesting has a number of things that worry me:
1. As a general principle, it is not a good idea to be cycling
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature Request: Implement
an'Volume Append Duration' pool directive
Unfortunately, I don't understand the explanation below -- more
precisely, I don't understand what it fixes. Can anyone explain the
need for this Feature Request to me?
I just
Sorry, I only have my one reason, Setting up a separate pool for every
day, and also every week seems a bit much. I have an admim job which
closes the last tape used at the end of each days backup run. It
works. I will continue using it.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 11 February 2009
On Monday 16 February 2009 16:37:52 Brian Debelius wrote:
Sorry, I only have my one reason, Setting up a separate pool for every
day, and also every week seems a bit much. I have an admim job which
closes the last tape used at the end of each days backup run. It
works. I will continue
Yes, exactly. I cannot give any other reasons for this other then what
I have said. My need is to close the tape after x hours of no writes.
You said you did not want to mix weeks, and I do not want to mix days.
I guess I could make a Monday pool, and a Tuesday pool, but that seems a
bit
Hi, Sorry, you missed the boat. :)
Kevin Keane wrote:
He would like a volume marked used not at the beginning of a backup job,
but only after the backup job has successfully completed. That way, if
the backup failed, the same tape could be reused.
Only after all the jobs have
I don't see the need for this feature. With the current code, there is no
harm if the tape is marked used while a job is running, so please explain
why this feature is needed.
Regards,
Kern
Item 1: Implement an 'Volume Append Duration' pool directive
Origin: Brian Debelius, bdebelius at
I rotate sets of tapes each day. I would like the last tape used in the
backup to be marked used after a certain amount of time has elapsed. It
matters not to me when the volume was first written to. For me, Volume
use duration marks tapes used too early if there is a hiccup in the
backup
...@sibbald.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:20 PM
To: bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature Request: Implement an'Volume
Append Duration' pool directive
Unfortunately, I don't understand the explanation below -- more
) 422-1882
lebl...@byu.edu
-Original Message-
From: Jean Gobin [mailto:jgo...@strozllc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:30 PM
To: Kern Sibbald; bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Feature Request:
Implementan'Volume
I have a hunch that what he is really getting at is two separate
features. I could be way off base, my mind reading machine is currently
in the shop ;-)
He would like a volume marked used not at the beginning of a backup job,
but only after the backup job has successfully completed. That way,
Hello,
And why not use an encrypted filesystem to store your media ?
One major advantage, it's already there and can be functionnal in 30mins,
an other advantage, is that a simple cp permit to crypt old backups.
Bye
Le Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:33:21 Tobias Barth, vous avez écrit :
Hi,
Hello,
I have added this Feature Request to the projects list for the next vote --
probably a month or two from now.
Best regards,
Kern
On Friday 12 December 2008 10:47:42 Ralf Gross wrote:
Item 1: Maximum Concurrent Jobs for drives when used with changer
device Origin: Ralf Gross
I have added this to the projects list.
Best regards,
Kern
On Monday 28 April 2008 11:43:36 Tobias Barth wrote:
Hi,
after nearly 3 years of writing nothing here, I am back - with a feature
request :)
I recently upgraded from bacula 1.36 to 2.2.8 in order to use the job
spooling feature.
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 10:04:55 Tobias Barth wrote:
Hi,
I yesterday mailed an informal feature request. Here is the formal
version of it:
Feature Request Form
Item n: Data encryption on storage daemon
Origin: Tobias Barth tobias.barth at web-arts.com
Date: 04
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:33:21 Tobias Barth wrote:
Hi,
since Bacula supports encryption of file data now, I wonder what to do
with old unencrypted tapes. I think it would be good if one of the tools
that come with bacula would allow tapes to be encrypted - by reading
their data to
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Well, in the beginning of a development cycle, smaller changes are sometimes
implemented rapidly by the developers, but at the end of a development cycle,
as is currently the case, a request could get lost if it is not officially
submitted.
I know. I just
Hello,
Well, in the beginning of a development cycle, smaller changes are sometimes
implemented rapidly by the developers, but at the end of a development cycle,
as is currently the case, a request could get lost if it is not officially
submitted.
I think this is a very good idea and well
On Saturday 18 October 2008 11:13:51 Cameron Smith wrote:
Dear Bacula Community, please find attached a new Feature Request in the
format indicated on bacula.org.
regards,
Cameron Smith
Database, Lda
Rua de Tchamba, 356
Maputo
Mozambique
It is now in the projects file.
Thanks,
Kern
Thanks, I have added this to the projects file.
Kern
On Friday 22 February 2008 11.54:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Item 1: Backup and Restore of Windows Encrypted Files through raw
encryption functions
Origin: Michael Mohr, SAG
Date: 22 February 2008
Status:
What: Make it
Item 1: Implement a Copy job type that will copy the
jobdata from one device to another, for example,
copy from a fiel Tape to a real Tape.
This function already exists in Bacula. Define a nextpool resource in
the disk pool definition and define a migration job, and schedule it as
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 19:30, David Boyes wrote:
Item 1: Implement a Copy job type that will copy the
jobdata from one device to another, for example,
copy from a fiel Tape to a real Tape.
This function already exists in Bacula. Define a nextpool resource in
the disk pool
Hi,
it's also quite close to overkill, but maybe the editiorial queue of
scoop (think kuro5hin.org) could be abused.
I don't see much of a difference between voting up a good story or a
good feature :)
Downloads and information are here:
http://scoop.kuro5hin.org/
Florian
2007/5/25, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 5/25/2007 10:42 AM, Rich wrote:
On 2007.05.24. 01:05, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 5/23/2007 3:12 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one
is
collecting these, and so you will
Hi,
On 5/26/2007 9:29 AM, Mikael Kermorgant wrote:
2007/5/25, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
If Mantis manages votes, couldn't that be a solution ?
I don't think mantis does that.
I've been a zimbra (www.zimbra.com http://www.zimbra.com) user for
some
2007/5/26, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 5/26/2007 9:29 AM, Mikael Kermorgant wrote:
2007/5/25, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
If Mantis manages votes, couldn't that be a solution ?
I don't think mantis does that.
Seems you're right, I too k a
On 2007.05.24. 01:05, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 5/23/2007 3:12 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one is
collecting these, and so you will probably need to resubmit it later.
Not exactly... I'm still thinking about how to do
Hi,
On 5/25/2007 10:42 AM, Rich wrote:
On 2007.05.24. 01:05, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 5/23/2007 3:12 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one is
collecting these, and so you will probably need to resubmit it later.
Not
On Thursday 24 May 2007 00:05, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 5/23/2007 3:12 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one is
collecting these, and so you will probably need to resubmit it later.
Not exactly... I'm still thinking
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one is
collecting these, and so you will probably need to resubmit it later.
Concerning the request itself. This is very unlikely to be implemented any
time in the near future unless someone contributes the code, because
Hi,
On 5/23/2007 3:12 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your feature request. Unfortunately at the moment no one is
collecting these, and so you will probably need to resubmit it later.
Not exactly... I'm still thinking about how to do this properly, but in
the meantime, I hope I
On Apr 14, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
would you re-write the Feature Request using my terminology and
resubmit it?
Uhm, okay. I'll try, although I'm not sure what terminology I'm missing.
As I see it, you are asking to implement a Client Priority = nn
directive in
Hello,
I've added this to the pending-projects, which means it is in limbo, but not
forgotten unless sufficient Bacula community interest develops for it.
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 21:29, Darien Hager wrote:
Item 1: Allow Jobdefs to inherit from other Jobdefs
Origin: Darien Hager [EMAIL
Hello,
This Feature Request is a bit confusing to me. I think I get it, but I am not
sure. I will present what I think you mean, and if it is the case, would you
re-write the Feature Request using my terminology and resubmit it? Also,
please clarify the the first part of your example
Hi,
On 4/10/2007 11:14 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Although, I am really pleased at seeing lots of people using Bacula, and
interest in improving it, we seem to be getting a lot of Feature Requests.
In fact, given our currently very limited programming resources, I feel we
have way too many
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 23:26, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 4/10/2007 11:14 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Although, I am really pleased at seeing lots of people using Bacula, and
interest in improving it, we seem to be getting a lot of Feature Requests.
In fact, given our currently very
# bacula-dir -c '|/usr/local/sbin/generate-dir-config'
... would cause it to run /usr/local/sbin/generate-dir-config to
generate a new configuration file.
Hey, that sounds pretty useful. When you say globally, I assume you
mean that I can just toss a similar line into bacula-dir
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:40, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Bacula does its normal HMAC-MD5 password authentication
I never meant to imply that it did not, although my message was
obviously interpreted that way by at least two people.
The FD address cannot be
Jorj Bauer wrote:
I didn't actually craft this patch to address any TLS weakness; I wrote
it to address a feature flaw/conflict.
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I mentioned at some point, that's mostly paranoia. As you say, you'd
have to compromise both
Bacula does its normal HMAC-MD5 password authentication
I never meant to imply that it did not, although my message was
obviously interpreted that way by at least two people.
The FD address cannot be part of the certificate (CN or any other field)
if roaming FDs are ever to be supported.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:04:00AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 22:29, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 14, 2007, at 13:41, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I mentioned at some point, that's mostly paranoia. As you
On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:46, Jorj Bauer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:04:00AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 22:29, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 14, 2007, at 13:41, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I
On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:40, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Bacula does its normal HMAC-MD5 password authentication
I never meant to imply that it did not, although my message was
obviously interpreted that way by at least two people.
The FD address cannot be part of the certificate (CN or any
Sorry for the late arrival. An opendarwin.org e-mail hiccup ate my
subscription.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Well, I care, and I don't trust DNS at all. From what I read here,
IMO the current implementation is nothing like I imagined -- it is
not the state of the art in security. With ssh, I
I didn't actually craft this patch to address any TLS weakness; I wrote
it to address a feature flaw/conflict.
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I mentioned at some point, that's mostly paranoia. As you say, you'd
have to compromise both DNS and one of the root
On Mar 14, 2007, at 13:41, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I mentioned at some point, that's mostly paranoia. As you say,
you'd
have to compromise both DNS and one of the root CAs to exploit it. I
only mentioned it for those that are
Hello Landon,
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 20:34, Landon Fuller wrote:
Sorry for the late arrival. An opendarwin.org e-mail hiccup ate my
subscription.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Well, I care, and I don't trust DNS at all. From what I read here,
IMO the current implementation is nothing like I
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 22:29, Landon Fuller wrote:
On Mar 14, 2007, at 13:41, Jorj Bauer wrote:
Let's take the DNS security issue off the table for the moment.
As I mentioned at some point, that's mostly paranoia. As you say,
you'd
have to compromise both DNS and one of the root CAs
On 13 Jan 2007 at 12:27, Eric Bollengier wrote:
Le Samedi 13 Janvier 2007 12:10, Andreas Németh a écrit :
Item 1: Adjust database-scripts to be able to run remotely
Origin: Andreas Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 January 2007
Status:
What: Adjust the database scripts
On Saturday 13 January 2007 17:02, Dan Langille wrote:
On 13 Jan 2007 at 12:27, Eric Bollengier wrote:
Le Samedi 13 Janvier 2007 12:10, Andreas Németh a écrit :
Item 1: Adjust database-scripts to be able to run remotely
Origin: Andreas Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 09:14, kshatriyak wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, kshatriyak wrote:
Item n: add an item to the restore option where you can select a pool
I thought about this last days, and maybe on second thought, it might be
better to be able to select the most recent backup
Hello,
Could you reformat and reword your Feature request a bit so that I can
understand it, and easily include it in the projects list for voting. It
needs (IMO) the following things:
1. Eliminate the sarcasim, complaints, and the use of I, and stick to the
problem and solutions. If you
On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:20, Jesper Krogh wrote:
The cost of doing a Verify -- Catalog is really quite minimal, so in my
opinion, I don't see the benefit in complicatint Backup jobs any more than
they are.
I don't know if they are complicated already.. This feature is far to small
to
task. But in order for me to try to detect a silent data corruption
with the verify feature I need to do a full read-through of the entire
disk just for the verify process. But Bacula does a full read-through
of the disk everytime I schedule a Full backup anyway.
When bacula is performing
Item 1: Automatically detection of silent data corruption
Date: 1. september 2006
Origin: Jesper Krogh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: Unimplemented.
What: Detect silent data-corruption automatically.
When a full backup are performed there is (when configured so)
put
Hello,
I believe, if I understand your request, that this feature already exists.
It works a bit differently from what you suggest, but it also gives you a lot
more control. It is called Verify. First you run a Verify job with your
FileSet -- normally it will not be the same as your backup
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I am considering that there is no need
to add this to the list of projects.
I'm totally aware of the Verify feature and yes it accomplishes the same
task. But in order for me to try to detect a silent data corruption
with the verify
On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:20, Jesper Krogh wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I am considering that there is no
need
to add this to the list of projects.
I'm totally aware of the Verify feature and yes it accomplishes the same
task. But in order for
69 matches
Mail list logo
