Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-05-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Nice.  That is very good throughput.  Thanks for reporting your results ... Best regards, Kern On 5/5/21 7:05 AM, fk+bacula--- via Bacula-users wrote: I have found  the solution: There

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-05-04 Thread fk+bacula--- via Bacula-users
I have found  the solution: There was a cooling issue inside the server which mounts the LTO drive. A fan wasn't working. The higher temperature slows down the drive drive speed. Now I have backed up: Despooling elapsed time = 00:39:31, Transfer rate = 285.3 M Bytes/second Using 20 GB file

[Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-26 Thread Udo Kaune
Hi, The speed test is not to the tape but to and from the spool drive only. The transfer rates are from real data (audio files). HTH Am 26.04.21 um 16:17 schrieb Kern Sibbald: Hello, If you are sending blocks of zeros to a tape drive, it is useless to compare speeds to anything that sends

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, If you are sending blocks of zeros to a tape drive, it is useless to compare speeds to anything that sends real data.  Zero data input to most tape drives is almost completely optimized (compressed) out, so one gets very large, unrealistic speeds.  Try

[Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-25 Thread Udo Kaune
In regard to possible compression 360MB/sec seems slow for a spool drive serving an LTO-7. This is data from an 8 drive RAID 6 DELL box (PERC730P): root@pangaea:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1M count=32000 33554432000 bytes (34 GB, 31 GiB) copied, 1.89847 s, 17.7 GB/s root@pangaea:~# dd

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-21 Thread William Muriithi
-users Sent: April 21, 2021 10:20 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-21 Thread fk+bacula--- via Bacula-users
Thanks Kern, I will ask Quantum about the best setting for the Block Size. The file size I have set to 20 GB at the moment. Thanks, Frank Am 21.04.2021 um 12:09 schrieb Kern Sibbald: From my experience (up to LTO-5), using 524288 as a block size is a reasonable size.  However LTO-7 drives are

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, From my experience (up to LTO-5), using 524288 as a block size is a reasonable size.  However LTO-7 drives are even faster, so you might try some tests with Maximum block size = 1048576.  Some people recommend much larger sizes, but in my tests (LTO-5) there

[Bacula-users] LTO-7 btape speed test

2021-04-21 Thread fk+bacula--- via Bacula-users
Hello there, I'm using a Quantum LTO-7 HH drive with Ultrium LTO-7 tapes. The streamer is connected on a SAS HAB microsemi 1100-4i. I set the Maximum block size = 524288 and run: speed file_size=3 skip_raw with zero data and bacula block structure Total Write rate = *311.7 MB/s* with random