Any idea when the source rpm will be back? I saw that the bad one had
been taken down from sf, but there has been no word about its replacement.
Scott Barninger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should
> address the RedHat (and clone) issues discusse
> ditto here
>
> Scott Ruckh wrote:
>> I am receiving the following errors:
>>
>> rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
>> error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad
>> error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed
>>
>> I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and
ditto here
Scott Ruckh wrote:
> I am receiving the following errors:
>
> rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
> error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad
> error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed
>
> I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and the bacula p
"Scott Barninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti
viestissä:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello,
>
> bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should
> address the RedHat (and clone) issues discussed recently as well as
> introducing support for SuSE 10.3.
>
Could someone pls. check if the
I am receiving the following errors:
rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad
error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and the bacula public key
installed.
Any suggestions?
--
Hello,
bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should
address the RedHat (and clone) issues discussed recently as well as
introducing support for SuSE 10.3.
The following issues have been corrected:
* Sun Nov 11 2007
- add new files required by rescue makefile
* Sat Nov 10 2
