> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:40:51 -0400, Ryan Novosielski said:
>
> Ralf Gross wrote:
> > Troy Daniels schrieb:
> >> Did /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 contain files created/modified before job 234?
> >
> > No I created /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 after job 234.
> >
> >> And if so, did Bacula back them up?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Gross wrote:
> Troy Daniels schrieb:
>> Did /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 contain files created/modified before job 234?
>
> No I created /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 after job 234.
>
>> And if so, did Bacula back them up?
>>
>> Imagine this scenario:
>>
>> 1
Troy Daniels schrieb:
>
> Did /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 contain files created/modified before job 234?
No I created /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 after job 234.
> And if so, did Bacula back them up?
>
> Imagine this scenario:
>
> 1) /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 is created and files copied into it.
> 2) Full Job
CC'ing the list. Why doesn't "reply" reply to the list??
On Thu, July 12, 2007 10:15 am, Malcolm Hunter wrote:
>
> On Thu, July 12, 2007 10:00 am, Troy Daniels wrote:
>> One question,
>>
>> Did /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 contain files created/modified before job 234?
>>
>> And if so, did Bacula back th
One question,
Did /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 contain files created/modified before job 234?
And if so, did Bacula back them up?
Imagine this scenario:
1) /tmp/bacula-test/dir2 is created and files copied into it.
2) Full Job 234 runs and does a full backup of /tmp/bacula-test/dir1
3) More files are
Ryan Novosielski schrieb:
> Has anyone done a test that verifies exactly what this does?
>
> If I add a new directory to my fileset, and I have this directive turns
> on, do the new files get backed up as part of the incremental?
>
> I have personally been doing as Craig said -- adding new major
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone done a test that verifies exactly what this does?
If I add a new directory to my fileset, and I have this directive turns
on, do the new files get backed up as part of the incremental?
I have personally been doing as Craig said -- adding n
from the docs:
Ignore FileSet Changes =
Normally, if you modify the FileSet Include or Exclude lists,
the next backup will be forced to a Full so that Bacula can
guarantee that any additions or deletions are properly saved.
If this directive is set to yes
this is one of the first lines in the chapter "The FileSet Resource" of the
manual:
> Ignore FileSet Changes =
> Normally, if you modify the FileSet Include or Exclude lists, the next
> backup will be forced to a Full so that Bacula can guarantee that any
> additions or deletions are prope
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 12:59 -0500, Zeratul wrote:
> Hi
>
> Every time when I'm doing a change in the FileSet for a client, the next
> backup is upgraded to Full from Incremental. There is any posibility to avoid
> this behavior? Sometimes the changes are really small but the full backup
> takes a
Hi
Every time when I'm doing a change in the FileSet for a client, the next
backup is upgraded to Full from Incremental. There is any posibility to avoid
this behavior? Sometimes the changes are really small but the full backup
takes a lot of space and time. Any idea will be appreciated.
Thanks
11 matches
Mail list logo
