On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:21:05PM -0400, Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure)
wrote:
But with tapes you do have the
simple constraint of is there really a tape for this?
Is it possible to constrain bacula to only create volumes when it has a
blank tape in the drive to label? This whole
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Rhett
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:55 PM
To: Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure)
Cc: Arno Lehmann; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Auto-labeling volumes depending
, September 21, 2005 11:28 AM
To: Arno Lehmann
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Auto-labeling volumes depending on
tape-in-drive?
Okay, Arno, you seem to know the most about the labelling so let's throw
this at you.
Obviously, with disk-based volumes, you
, 2005 10:56 PM
To: Bennett, Silas (GE Infrastructure)
Cc: Arno Lehmann; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Auto-labeling volumes depending on
tape-in-drive?
What do you mean? I'm talking about limiting this aggressive wishism.
I'm not certain how a scratch pool would apply
