Hello,
You might be interested in checking this thread:
https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/36386670/
A perl script is mentioned there:
https://github.com/hreinecke/sg3_utils/issues/18 which can provide you
with e.g. daily reports of raw space remaining on tapes.
Thanks,
Adam
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 09:44, krashoverr...@free.fr wrote:
> My client has 1.3 To to backup, i'm having an LTO4 drive, meaning 800Go
> native, 1.6To compressed, so I've set my pool to have a Maximum Volume
> Bytes to 1600G
800 GB is the real capacity of an LTO-4 cartridge.
The 1,6 TB
Hey there!
New question for you, about job compression (on tapes)
I'm running Bacula 7.4.4 server, with a 5.2.6 client (and PG db)
My client has 1.3 To to backup, i'm having an LTO4 drive, meaning 800Go native,
1.6To compressed, so I've set my pool to have a Maximum Volume Bytes to 1600G
I've
[--]
Can you be a little more specific about don't worl? What doesn't
work? Compression? Backups?
If you're not getting compression and you're asking about that, from the
fragmentary bits of configuration you've posted above you appear to have
compression both turned on and turned off.
I'm currently using this Fileset in my windows servers and it's working fine
(bacula v. 2.4.4).
FileSet {
Name = XXXFileset
Enable VSS = yes
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
compression=GZIP
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:35:20PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 05/03/10 06:02, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem,
I had installed bacula 5.0.1. on Winows client, and work fine, but I
have no compression
Software Compression: None
while
FileSet {
Hi all,
I have a problem,
I had installed bacula 5.0.1. on Winows client, and work fine, but I
have no compression
Software Compression: None
while
FileSet {
Name = FS-test-windows
Enable VSS = yes
Ignore FileSet Changes = no
Include {
File = C:/Programmi/Test
Options {
On 3.5.2010 13:02, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem,
I had installed bacula 5.0.1. on Winows client, and work fine, but I
have no compression
Software Compression: None
while
FileSet {
Name = FS-test-windows
Enable VSS = yes
Ignore FileSet Changes = no
On 05/03/10 15:08, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 3.5.2010 13:02, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem,
I had installed bacula 5.0.1. on Winows client, and work fine, but I
have no compression
Software Compression: None
while
FileSet {
Name = FS-test-windows
Enable VSS
On 05/03/10 06:02, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem,
I had installed bacula 5.0.1. on Winows client, and work fine, but I
have no compression
Software Compression: None
while
FileSet {
Name = FS-test-windows
Enable VSS = yes
Ignore FileSet Changes = no
Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Thanks for any help...
Regards
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
TI
Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
On 10.02.2010 / 09:05:19 -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
or even Parallel BZIP2, see
On 02/10/10 06:05, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
It is true that bzip2 is more efficient than gzip,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:05:19AM -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
(...) gzip or I can use another compress program...
No.
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
$ du -m /tmp/foo.iso
625 /tmp/foo.iso
$ gzip -c /tmp/foo.iso
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
$ du -m /tmp/foo.iso
625 /tmp/foo.iso
$ gzip -c/tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K/dev/null
0+34388 records in
0+34388 records
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
[...]
255526 bytes less while six times slower..
This is extremely dependent on the contents of
On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Sean M Clark wrote:
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
[...]
255526 bytes less while
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about as fast as gzip while compressing
On 2010Feb10 10:31 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about
On 02/10/10 10:36, Sean M Clark wrote:
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about as fast as gzip while compressing
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:54:35 +0100, Gavin McCullagh said:
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Another useful feature might be a wildcard excludefromcompression
directive so you could say:
This might avoid wasting time trying to compress the unccompressible while
Thank you, John.
best rds,
Simone
John Drescher escreveu:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Simone S.
Santiagosim...@magistrainfo.com.br wrote:
Hey co-workers,
I wonder if it is possible improve the Bacula compression?
I am using "compression = GZIP" but sometimes it compress
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:53 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Simone S.
Santiagosim...@magistrainfo.com.br wrote:
Hey co-workers,
I wonder if it is possible improve the Bacula compression?
I am using compression = GZIP but sometimes it compress
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Gavin McCullaghgavin.mccull...@gcd.ie wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Another useful feature might be a wildcard excludefromcompression
directive so you could say:
excludefromcompression {
pattern = *.zip
pattern = *.gz
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos
Santoslistas@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:53 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Simone S.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos
Santoslistas@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:53 PM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Simone S.
Santiagosim...@magistrainfo.com.br wrote:
Hey co-workers,
I wonder if it is possible
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos
Santoslistas@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
You are not using the same exact dataset (145GB versus 140GB source
data ) in both tests so its meaningless that GZIP6 is
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Victor Hugo dos
Santoslistas@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Drescherdresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Victor Hugo dos
Santoslistas@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
You are not using the same exact dataset
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Some time ago, I've made some tests on a customer site.
They have plenty data that could be compressed ( a 75% ratio )
With GZIP ( which is equal to gzip default level 6 ) we loose hours of
compression to obtain finally only a 78% ratio
Gavin McCullagh wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Some time ago, I've made some tests on a customer site.
They have plenty data that could be compressed ( a 75% ratio )
With GZIP ( which is equal to gzip default level 6 ) we loose hours of
compression to obtain
Hi,
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Most of the data are compressible ( exchange server storage, and Navision
Database ) at a 75% rate with gzip2
we have 78% with gzip6 but it double easyly the time need to obtain it. So
sometime it doesn't help to try to do big compression.
John Drescher wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Simone S.
Santiagosim...@magistrainfo.com.br wrote:
Hey co-workers,
I wonder if it is possible improve the Bacula compression?
I am using compression = GZIP but sometimes it compress only 15% of
all volume.
Note: My backup is FILE
Hey co-workers,
I wonder if it is possible improve the Bacula compression?
I am using compression = GZIP but sometimes it compress only 15% of
all volume.
Note: My backup is FILE Type.
Best Regards,
Simone
--
Enter
Oh yes, it would be nice..
Ok, so you're telling me that I need to patch the code myself in order
to make other compression methods working? The problem is that this
network is composed of SOME HUNDREDS of server with different
distributions (redhat, fedora, debian) so I wish I could found
Compression is handled by the FD, so you will find all the related
compression code there. However, you will also need to patch the DIR
and the SD to recognize the new compression. I was looking into this
before, and I probably will again, but the compression code isn't
really simple so adding a
The compression project was abandoned, but in theory it should not be
hard to create. GZIP is OK, but there are better things out there now
like rk, rar and 7z
Diego Roccia wrote:
Hi all,
a question: is there a way to implement other compression methods (like
lzo) in bacula? I found an old
I think that LZMA would definitely be a nice addition to bacula (which
is used by the 7z format) to compress the data.
-Michael
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
Diego Roccia wrote:
Hi all,
a question: is there a way to implement other compression methods (like
lzo) in bacula? I found an old patch for bacula 1.3.something are
there any news about this?
thanks in advance
Diego
One thing that should be a big big advantage would be to have
Hi all,
a question: is there a way to implement other compression methods (like
lzo) in bacula? I found an old patch for bacula 1.3.something are
there any news about this?
thanks in advance
Diego
-
This SF.net email is
Hi everybody,
I got 2 problems with my bacula configuration :
I got 41,xxx,xxx kbytes of data to backup (got this number with estimate
command in bacula console), but when a full backup has finished It take 2 tapes
with 38,xxx,xxx kbytes on one tape and 22,xxx,xxx in the other. I precise
40 matches
Mail list logo
