Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Thanks for any help...
Regards
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
TI
Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
On 10.02.2010 / 09:05:19 -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
or even Parallel BZIP2, see
On 02/10/10 06:05, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
Hi folks...
I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can
use another compress program...
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
It is true that bzip2 is more efficient than gzip,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:05:19AM -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote:
(...) gzip or I can use another compress program...
No.
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
$ du -m /tmp/foo.iso
625 /tmp/foo.iso
$ gzip -c /tmp/foo.iso
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
$ du -m /tmp/foo.iso
625 /tmp/foo.iso
$ gzip -c/tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K/dev/null
0+34388 records in
0+34388 records
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
[...]
255526 bytes less while six times slower..
This is extremely dependent on the contents of
On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Sean M Clark wrote:
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more
efficient...
Really?
[...]
255526 bytes less while
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about as fast as gzip while compressing
On 2010Feb10 10:31 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about
On 02/10/10 10:36, Sean M Clark wrote:
xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma
seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little
better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's
about as fast as gzip while compressing
10 matches
Mail list logo