[Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Thanks for any help... Regards Gilberto Nunes Ferreira TI Selbetti Gestão de Documentos

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Anatoly Pugachev
On 10.02.2010 / 09:05:19 -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... or even Parallel BZIP2, see

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/10/10 06:05, Gilberto Nunes wrote: Hi folks... I need to know if the Compression flag on FileSet must be gzip or I can use another compress program... I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... It is true that bzip2 is more efficient than gzip,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Petar Bogdanovic
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:05:19AM -0200, Gilberto Nunes wrote: (...) gzip or I can use another compress program... No. I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? $ du -m /tmp/foo.iso 625 /tmp/foo.iso $ gzip -c /tmp/foo.iso

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Steve Polyack
On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? $ du -m /tmp/foo.iso 625 /tmp/foo.iso $ gzip -c/tmp/foo.iso | dd bs=64K/dev/null 0+34388 records in 0+34388 records

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Sean M Clark
On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? [...] 255526 bytes less while six times slower.. This is extremely dependent on the contents of

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Steve Polyack
On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Sean M Clark wrote: On 2010Feb10 8:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: On 2/10/2010 8:16 AM, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: I want use bzip2 to compress my file, because I thing bzip2 is more efficient... Really? [...] 255526 bytes less while

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread John Doe
From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other than GZIP {xz/lzma]

2010-02-10 Thread Sean M Clark
On 2010Feb10 10:31 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Sean M Clark smcl...@tamu.edu xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Compression - other then GZIP

2010-02-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/10/10 10:36, Sean M Clark wrote: xz/lzma is another consideration. At moderate compression levels, lzma seems to be about the same or slightly faster than bzip2 with a little better compression. At lower compression levels it seems like it's about as fast as gzip while compressing