Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:00, Dominic Marks wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 00:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
From top:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
I j
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:00, Dominic Marks wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 01 May 2006 00:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
> >> From top:
> >>
> >> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> >> 28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
> >>
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 00:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
From top:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
I just noticed this on one of our Bacula servers. Curious since the SD
shou
On Monday 01 May 2006 00:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
> From top:
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> 28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
>
> I just noticed this on one of our Bacula servers. Curious since the SD
> shouldn't be us
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
bacula3 20 0 4364K 2212K kserel 0:00 0.00% bacula-sd
Presumably this is being caused by a memory leak somewhere. Anyone else
Dom: You should watch the process in real-time and determine if the
usage grows during backup job activity or if it is slowly growin
> bacula3 20 0 4364K 2212K kserel 0:00 0.00% bacula-sd
> > >
> > > Presumably this is being caused by a memory leak somewhere. Anyone else
Dom: You should watch the process in real-time and determine if the
usage grows during backup job activity or if it is slowly growing over
time.
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2006 at 23:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
>
> > From top:
> >
> > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> > 28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
> >
> > I just noticed this on one of
On 30 Apr 2006 at 23:41, Dominic Marks wrote:
> From top:
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
> 28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
>
> I just noticed this on one of our Bacula servers. Curious since the SD
> shouldn't be usi
From top:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
28233 bacula 3 200 269M 265M kserel 173:54 0.00% bacula-sd
I just noticed this on one of our Bacula servers. Curious since the SD
shouldn't be using much memory at all from what I know of it.
OS is FreeBSD
