On Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:11, John Drescher wrote:
> > I consider it stable, but given that it is a *very* large body of brand
> > new code, we can expect a number of bugs to crop up when it becomes
> > heavily used under varying conditions. I don't expect any of the bugs to
> > be a show sto
On 2007.08.08. 16:59, Kern Sibbald wrote:
...
>>> You can see an overview of the features at:
>>>
>>>http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/GUI_Programs.html
>> Is bat going to be considered stable for this release? I am sorry if I
>> missed that.
>
> I consider it stable, but given that it is a *ve
> I consider it stable, but given that it is a *very* large body of brand new
> code, we can expect a number of bugs to crop up when it becomes heavily used
> under varying conditions. I don't expect any of the bugs to be a show
> stopper. I have used it exclusively for at least four months now.
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 15:36, John Drescher wrote:
> > During the process of getting it fully functional, I found the JobList
> > feature of bat particularly useful because it instantly showed me which
> > jobs failed, and by right clicking on them, I could even see the Job
> > Report with the
> During the process of getting it fully functional, I found the JobList feature
> of bat particularly useful because it instantly showed me which jobs failed,
> and by right clicking on them, I could even see the Job Report with the
> details of the errors. Pretty cool. Though bat was initially
