Re: [Bacula-users] Client-only configure option (but why no analogous Storage-only option?)

2007-10-26 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
> > > configuration without this option. This option greatly facilitates > building > > > a Client on a client only machine. > > > > > > > This is fantastic. But why is there also not an equivalent option for > > building only the Storage Daemon? For example, I will be running the Storage > > Daem

Re: [Bacula-users] Client-only configure option (but why no analogous Storage-only option?)

2007-10-26 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:24:29 -1000, Hydro Meteor said: > > Hi all, > > I noticed in the Bacula User's guide there is a configure option (when > building Bacula from Source): > > --enable-client-only > > > > Described as: > > This option causes the make process to build only the File daem

[Bacula-users] Client-only configure option (but why no analogous Storage-only option?)

2007-10-26 Thread Hydro Meteor
Hi all, I noticed in the Bacula User's guide there is a configure option (when building Bacula from Source): --enable-client-only > Described as: This option causes the make process to build only the File daemon and the > libraries that it needs. None of the other daemons, storage tools, nor th