BTW, thanks for the responses!
On 6/27/07, Clyde O Goffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK so I guess the answer is there's no real way to do it all with bacula.
You have to use some outside utility which is kindof a nuisance in terms of
managing your backups. If bacula had this functionality th
Hi,
27.06.2007 21:41,, Thomas Traeger wrote::
>
>> Also, tortoise is windows only IIRC, and I'd need something really
>> simple for a terminal session on linux. Actually, I think using the
>> command line tools is the best approach for me, but that requires me
>> to understand things first :-)
> Also, tortoise is windows only IIRC, and I'd need something really
> simple for a terminal session on linux. Actually, I think using the
> command line tools is the best approach for me, but that requires me
> to understand things first :-)
>
this may help ;o)
http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/
Hi,
27.06.2007 11:09,, Falk Sauer wrote::
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Wednesday 27 June 2007 writes Arno Lehmann:
>> 27.06.2007 07:12,, Falk Sauer wrote:
>
>>> Arno: have you write permissions for the doc repo?
>> I'm not sure... I guess it's possible, but I haven't even accessed the
>> source since the c
OK so I guess the answer is there's no real way to do it all with bacula.
You have to use some outside utility which is kindof a nuisance in terms of
managing your backups. If bacula had this functionality then I can use
bacula can manage it for me and I can look to bacula for a record of
everyth
Pool Type = This directive defines the pool type, which corresponds
to the type of Job being run. It is required and may be one of
the following:
Backup
*Archive
*Cloned
*Migration
*Copy
*Save
*Note, only Backup is current implemented.
I knew I saw it somewhere. But it does say its not implement
I would swear its there somewhere. I'll have to have a look.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 27.06.2007 00:26,, Brian Debelius wrote::
>
>> But its in the docs. :)
>>
>
> Where? :-)
>
> I guess this is a problem with terminology - What is called "cloning"
> in the manual, and what you ref
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> The same here. Anyway, Kern has told me he will (most probably) work
> on that some time, but it's not one of the high priority things.
Incidentally the work involved in this overlaps a LOT with the snapshot
restore and synthetic backup issues which kee
Hi Arno,
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 writes Arno Lehmann:
> 27.06.2007 07:12,, Falk Sauer wrote:
> > Arno: have you write permissions for the doc repo?
>
> I'm not sure... I guess it's possible, but I haven't even accessed the
> source since the change to subversion... I'd have to learn how to use
Hi,
I suppose we better put this to the list...
27.06.2007 06:46,, Del Miller wrote::
> Just a brief thought that I've been toying with but have not tested as
> of yet. Couldn't one run a script after a successful backup that would
> simply write the disk file to tape
Sure. You'd have to hand
Hi,
27.06.2007 07:12,, Falk Sauer wrote::
> Hi Arno,
>
> On Wednesday 27 June 2007 writes Arno Lehmann:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 27.06.2007 00:26,, Brian Debelius wrote::
>>> But its in the docs. :)
>> Where? :-)
>>
>> I guess this is a problem with terminology - What is called "cloning"
>> in the manual, an
On 2007.06.27. 08:12, Falk Sauer wrote:
...
> ps: i would also prefer a feature 'data cloning'* for offsite storage, but my
> timeframe and my rudimental programming skills in c isn't professional
> enought for projects like this one.
it seems like you might be interested in a feature request i
Hi Arno,
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 writes Arno Lehmann:
> Hi,
>
> 27.06.2007 00:26,, Brian Debelius wrote::
> > But its in the docs. :)
>
> Where? :-)
>
> I guess this is a problem with terminology - What is called "cloning"
> in the manual, and what you refer to, is probably this (Director
>
> co
Hi,
27.06.2007 00:26,, Brian Debelius wrote::
> But its in the docs. :)
Where? :-)
I guess this is a problem with terminology - What is called "cloning"
in the manual, and what you refer to, is probably this (Director
configuration, Job resource):
> Run =
> The Run directive (not to be co
But its in the docs. :)
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 26.06.2007 23:21,, Brian Debelius wrote::
>
>> You want what is called cloning. I'm not sure if it has been fully
>> implemented yet. I would like to do that also.
>>
>
> No, that's not implemented. I would even say that's not even b
Hi,
26.06.2007 23:21,, Brian Debelius wrote::
> You want what is called cloning. I'm not sure if it has been fully
> implemented yet. I would like to do that also.
No, that's not implemented. I would even say that's not even been
started to be implemented.
Arno
> brian-
>
> Clyde O Goffe w
You want what is called cloning. I'm not sure if it has been fully
implemented yet. I would like to do that also.
brian-
Clyde O Goffe wrote:
> Hey Peter,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure if this is what I want though.
> If I could migrate the data to Tape but also keep the data on d
Hey Peter,
Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure if this is what I want though. If I
could migrate the data to Tape but also keep the data on disk for fast
restores then that would be ideal. The Tapes will be kept offsite. I only
want to use the Tape for restores in the event that a restore fro
Hi Clyde,
In your pool definition include the key (Next Pool) with the right value:
Pool {
Name = host
Use Volume Once = yes
Pool Type = Backup
Auto Prune = yes
Volume Retention = 13 days
Label Format = host-
Maximum Volumes = 15
Recycle = yes
Storage = hostFiles
Next Pool =
Thanks in advanced!
On 6/26/07, Clyde O Goffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm interested in knowing if there is a feature that allows you to
automatically send a copy of a backup to disk off to tape for offsite
storage. I'm trying not to have to run two separate backups of the
Hello Everyone,
I'm interested in knowing if there is a feature that allows you to
automatically send a copy of a backup to disk off to tape for offsite
storage. I'm trying not to have to run two separate backups of the same
server but instead just run one backup and then have it copied off to t
21 matches
Mail list logo
