Are the failing block numbers always a little below 2^32 (like 4294944994 and
4294941825 in your messages)? If so, that maybe suggests a compiler bug if
the same source code works when compiled on the older machine (or is it the
same binary too?).
__Martin
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:30:59 +,
Are the failing block numbers always a little below 2^32 (like 4294944994 and
4294941825 in your messages)? If so, that maybe suggests a compiler
bug if the same source code works when compiled on the older machine (or is it
the same binary too?).
That is a very good spot, I hadn't picked up
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:14:20 +, Roberts, Ben said:
Are the failing block numbers always a little below 2^32 (like 4294944994
and
4294941825 in your messages)? If so, that maybe suggests a compiler
bug if the same source code works when compiled on the older machine (or is
it
Hello,
Every case of this particular error message that I have seen has been
due to data corruption outside of Bacula. Typically this happens when
a disk drive is bad, but since you are running ZFS and its checksums
are good, I can see only several other possibilities:
1. The ZFS code is messed
Hmm. Very clever of you Martin to notice that. Sounds like
a strong possibility ...
On 01/17/2014 01:01 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
Are the failing block numbers always a little below 2^32 (like 4294944994 and
4294941825 in your messages)? If so, that maybe suggests a compiler bug if
the same
)20 7959 8800
www.gsacapital.comhttp://www.gsacapital.com/
From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com]
Sent: 17 January 2014 17:23
To: Roberts, Ben; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Errors restoring from disk backup: Volume data
error Wanted ID: BB02, got
Hello
:23
*To:* Roberts, Ben; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] Errors restoring from disk backup:
Volume data error Wanted ID: BB02, got
Hello,
Every case of this particular error message that I have seen has been
due to data corruption outside of Bacula
On 1/14/2014 12:04 PM, Roberts, Ben
wrote:
Hi all,
Ive recently setup a new Bacula
director/storage daemon in preparation to move our existing
backups to newer hardware. During testing, Ive run
Hi Josh,
Could you downgrade the client to 5.0.2? I know SD and DIR are backward
compatible with older clients, but I'm not so sure what happens when the
client is a newer version.
Since this exact topic came up in IRC last night, I tried a restore of a backup
made by a 5.0 client (RHEL
Hi all,
I've recently setup a new Bacula director/storage daemon in preparation to move
our existing backups to newer hardware. During testing, I've run into problems
doing restores of backups taken to disk, failing with the messages:
Error: block.c:275 Volume data error at 24:4294944994!
10 matches
Mail list logo
