On Thursday 01 March 2007 21:13, Zeratul wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:27:12 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
>
> > On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:06, Zeratul wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > This is a bug. The jobid list should be filtered, and I
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:27:12 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 16:06, Zeratul wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
> > ...
> >
> > > This is a bug. The jobid list should be filtered, and I see the code does
> > > check the JobIds against the permitted
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
...
> This is a bug. The jobid list should be filtered, and I see the code does
> check the JobIds against the permitted Job names and complain if it is not
> allowed. However, it simply continues rather than removing the unauthorized
> jobid.
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 19:48, Zeratul wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
> ...
>
> > > - the command "help" retuns the full commands list and, for a
> > > restricted user,
> >
> > I'll look into filtering this ...
> >
> > > typing commands that returns "... is an
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:05:16 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote
...
> > - the command "help" retuns the full commands list and, for a restricted
> > user,
> I'll look into filtering this ...
>
> > typing commands that returns "... is an invalid command" can be
> > frustrating because the user have no idea
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback. I'll add these items to the documentation.
As for the problems of details of "show" and "list", I'm not sure it is worth
the effort to add finer grain ACL testing, however, I will note in my todo
list and see if it is possible. In general for the moment, you wi
Hi
Recently I tested the patch that fix the bug 767 (see bugs.bacula.org). The
patch works fine - the restricted console is not able anymore to cancel
running jobs that not belongs to it.
With this occasion I tested other commands and I found few things which, in my
opinion, should be mentioned,
