Re[2]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-22 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Hi Kern, > Some more thoughts on this: I'm not convinced that it is necessary to use > different directories, though it might be a good idea, but most likely if you > do not use different Pools (i.e. different volumes) you will have two jobs > writing into the same disk volume, which will not work

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
Some more thoughts on this: I'm not convinced that it is necessary to use different directories, though it might be a good idea, but most likely if you do not use different Pools (i.e. different volumes) you will have two jobs writing into the same disk volume, which will not work. On Thursday

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Josh Fisher
It looks like there is also only one schedule named "MonthlyCycle" and it specifies 2 Run directives which explicitly set the storage device for that level. So the jobs all start together and attempt to use the same storage device, but using different pools and different labels. For a tape devi

Re[2]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Kern, > It is perhaps not well documented, but concurrent jobs to the same Device > resource that references a file rather than a tape device is not supported. > To run multiple concurrent jobs, you must use different Device resources > pointing to different directories. I knew you're a Magic and

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Kern Sibbald
It is perhaps not well documented, but concurrent jobs to the same Device resource that references a file rather than a tape device is not supported. To run multiple concurrent jobs, you must use different Device resources pointing to different directories. On Thursday 21 April 2005 16:48, Alex

Re[10]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Dan, > Then the matter boils down to one of understanding. Help us to > understand what you've done, in a simple and concise manner. For > example, don't post your configs IN the email, but do make them > available for those than want to read them. OK. You're right. Sorry for that. Configs ma

Re[2]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Arno, > have you tried using only one storage device? There is one storage device for each backup level. > Apart from that, it might be helpful if you described your problem again > - not everybody will want to look through the older mail just to find > out what you refer to... Sure. The proble

Re: Re[8]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Apr 2005 at 18:24, Alexander Kolesnik wrote: > Dan, > > >> Perhaps, I've missed something.. Could you please point me to that > >> post or just tell me what was in that? Thanks you. > > > Try: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bacula.user/13054 > > Believe me, I read mentioned docs many

Re[8]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-21 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Dan, >> Perhaps, I've missed something.. Could you please point me to that >> post or just tell me what was in that? Thanks you. > Try: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bacula.user/13054 Believe me, I read mentioned docs many times before writing the letter to this list. -- Alexander ---

Re: Re[6]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Dan Langille
On 20 Apr 2005 at 18:01, Alexander Kolesnik wrote: > Dan, > > >> > Are you not getting satisfactory answers from the rest of us? > >> Actually, there was no _satisfactory_ answer.. > > > Then I suggest you read the documentation recently provided to you > > in this thread. > > Perhaps, I've mi

Re[6]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Dan, >> > Are you not getting satisfactory answers from the rest of us? >> Actually, there was no _satisfactory_ answer.. > Then I suggest you read the documentation recently provided to you in > this thread. Perhaps, I've missed something.. Could you please point me to that post or just tell m

Re: Re[4]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Dan Langille
On 20 Apr 2005 at 17:51, Alexander Kolesnik wrote: > Dear Dan, > > >> Erm.. Sorry, I didn't get: are you going to answer my question in > >> near future or no? > > > It sounds like he said no. > > Thanks. > > > Are you not getting satisfactory answers from the rest of us? > > Actually, there

Re[4]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Dear Dan, >> Erm.. Sorry, I didn't get: are you going to answer my question in near >> future or no? > It sounds like he said no. Thanks. > Are you not getting satisfactory answers from the rest of us? Actually, there was no _satisfactory_ answer.. -- Alexander --

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Jeffery P. Humes
I dont think I saw your original question. was this it? --- Hi, I'm trying to use cuncurrent jobs feature in bacule and have no success. I even tried 1.36.2-pool.patch - not a chance. ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Arno Lehmann
Alexander, have you tried using only one storage device? Apart from that, it might be helpful if you described your problem again - not everybody will want to look through the older mail just to find out what you refer to... Arno Alexander Kolesnik wrote: Guys! Anyone can help me? Kern! I hoped

Re: Re[2]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Dan Langille
On 20 Apr 2005 at 17:31, Alexander Kolesnik wrote: > Kern, > > >> Guys! Anyone can help me? Kern! I hoped you'd say something.. ;-( > > I am sorry, I am able to either answer support questions or to > > program, but not both. I have decided to do the latter. > > Erm.. Sorry, I didn't get: are yo

Re[2]: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Kern, >> Guys! Anyone can help me? Kern! I hoped you'd say something.. ;-( > I am sorry, I am able to either answer support questions or to program, but > not both. I have decided to do the latter. Erm.. Sorry, I didn't get: are you going to answer my question in near future or no? -- Alexander

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 21:40, Alexander Kolesnik wrote: > Guys! Anyone can help me? Kern! I hoped you'd say something.. ;-( I am sorry, I am able to either answer support questions or to program, but not both. I have decided to do the latter. -- Best regards, Kern ("> /\ V_V ---

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Another problem with concurrent jobs

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Kolesnik
Guys! Anyone can help me? Kern! I hoped you'd say something.. ;-( -- Sincerely, Alexander. This is a forwarded message From: Alexander Kolesnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sunday, April 17, 2005, 10:36:04 PM Subject: Another problem with concurrent jobs ===8