Would the regress scripts on trunk be sufficient? That runs daily.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com wrote:
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
It seems that I mistakenly thought that it
It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a struct,
which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
Kern
On Sunday 21 June 2009 17:55:43 Dan Langille wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Dan,
This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be compiled
Kern Sibbald wrote:
It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a struct,
which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
No worries. If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just
shout.
On Tuesday 23 June 2009 00:19:08 Dan Langille wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
It seems that I mistakenly thought that it had been converted into a
struct, which is not the case. Sorry for the false alarm.
No worries. If you want me to try out stuff on either 6.x or 7.x, just
shout.
It would
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello Dan,
This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be compiled and
run with encryption on Release 7 of FreeBSD. This is because the version of
pthreads in that release has pthread_t defined as a structure, which is
incompatible with OpenSSL.
Hello Dan,
This is to warn you that Bacula will probably not be able to be compiled and
run with encryption on Release 7 of FreeBSD. This is because the version of
pthreads in that release has pthread_t defined as a structure, which is
incompatible with OpenSSL. The OpenSSL API mandates