Yes that is probably right. I've gotten 1 TB on LTO-2 tapes a couple of
times. It just means that you have highly compressible data. I've found that
my incremental and differentials have much higher compression then my full
back-ups.
Robert
On 9/27/07 5:02 AM, hgrapt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, hgrapt wrote:
I'm just wondering if the output from bacula is correct ?
Volume Bytes: 1,470,728,448,000 (1.470 TB)
Quite possibly. I see 700Gb+ on my LTO2 tapes fairly regularly.
Logfiles, etc can be extremely compressible and they're the most often
backed up files on
I'm using a Quantum Autoloader with LTO 3 tapes (400/800 GB) with
HW-compression on.
I'm just wondering if the output from bacula is correct ?
Volume Bytes: 1,470,728,448,000 (1.470 TB)
It's still writing
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
On 9/27/07, hgrapt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a Quantum Autoloader with LTO 3 tapes (400/800 GB) with
HW-compression on.
I'm just wondering if the output from bacula is correct ?
Volume Bytes: 1,470,728,448,000 (1.470 TB)
I believe so. It said that Bacula wrote 1.47TB to your
I've gotten almost 1 TB on a LTO2 tape. It was filled with daily incremental
jobs which was mostly highly compressible log files. From what I've gathered
the Volume Bytes are uncompressed bytes. Since the compression is done on
the hardware, Bacula doesn't know the 'true' bytes. It would be nice
