Re: [Bacula-users] Log partition weirdness

2009-12-23 Thread Martin Simmons
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:27:49 -0700, Robert LeBlanc said: So, I've run into an interesting problem with 3.x. We have our servers configured for separate root, home and log partitions usually using LVM. I've seen this in the past, but now I'm looking to find an answer. We are running 3.0.2 on

Re: [Bacula-users] Log partition weirdness

2009-12-23 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.comwrote: Possibly you have sparse files in /var/log? Bacula can handle those better if you use the sparse=yes option in the FileSet (see the doc for more). I tried the sparse=yes, but that didn't help. I worked though a file

Re: [Bacula-users] Log partition weirdness

2009-12-23 Thread James Harper
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: Possibly you have sparse files in /var/log? Bacula can handle those better if you use the sparse=yes option in the FileSet (see the doc for more). I tried the sparse=yes, but that didn't

[Bacula-users] Log partition weirdness

2009-12-21 Thread Robert LeBlanc
So, I've run into an interesting problem with 3.x. We have our servers configured for separate root, home and log partitions usually using LVM. I've seen this in the past, but now I'm looking to find an answer. We are running 3.0.2 on Debian Squeeze, when we include the /var/log/ partition, either