Hi,
30.10.2008 04:47, Dan Langille wrote:
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the ability to use FIFOs to produce the data to be backed up is a nice
feature of Bacula, however, I don't really understand how this can work
reliably.
I understand the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
30.10.2008 04:47, Dan Langille wrote:
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the ability to use FIFOs to produce the data to be backed up is a nice
feature of Bacula, however, I don't
Arno Lehmann wrote:
30.10.2008 04:47, Dan Langille wrote:
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
I understand the concept, but I have problems with timing. I did a small
research on how FIFOs work. Consider the following script:
==
#!/bin/bash
exec /dev/null
mkfifo /tmp/tmpfifo
(
for n in `seq
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Shad L. Lords wrote:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
30.10.2008 04:47, Dan Langille wrote:
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
I understand the concept, but I have problems with timing. I did
a small
research on how FIFOs work. Consider the following script:
==
#!/bin/bash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the ability to use FIFOs to produce the data to be backed up is a nice
feature of Bacula, however, I don't really understand how this can work
reliably.
I understand the concept, but I have problems with timing. I did a small
research on how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the ability to use FIFOs to produce the data to be backed up is a nice
feature of Bacula, however, I don't really understand how this can work
reliably.
I understand the concept, but I have problems with timing. I did a small
research on how
SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the ability to use FIFOs to produce the data to be backed up is a nice
feature of Bacula, however, I don't really understand how this can work
reliably.
I understand the concept, but I have problems with
