Daniel Kamm wrote:
> Some months ago, I was *thinking* of such a similar solution with vtapes
> on hot swap disks. I was thinking of having disks instead of tapes and
> the possibility to have disk volumes (like tape volumes) put in and out
> of a disk array. We need to vacate media for environme
John Drescher wrote:
> I believe it is much better for your backups to use individual disks.
Why ? Single disk means a single failure leads to data loss. So it's not
reliable by itself. RAID is far from perfect, but RAID1 and RAID6 have
good price/size/reliability trade-offs, one can usually fin
Am 2/18/10 11:34 PM, schrieb Arthur Emerson III:
> I built a dedicated Bacula SD box from a 2U Intel-branded
> server. It has 12 x 1TB SATA drives, and boots off of an
> IDE solid state disk.
[..]
Thank you for your information Arthur. You should definitly post your
whole setup on Bacula Wiki, t
Heitor Faria wrote:
>
> I have a 12 tb disk array and I use the disks individually
> (since my boss dont want to use RAID). Each disk is a single
> storage for Bacula (but it makes addministration a little bit
> complex). Is there a way of using all disks volumes as a single
> Bacula storage?
On 2/18/2010 3:36 PM, Heitor Medrado de Faria wrote:
>> Google search for bacula vchanger
>>
>> John
>>
>>
> Thanks John. I will try that.
> But I think the only problem is I wont be able to run restore jobs while
> backup is running - simultaneously. Am I right?
>
>
vchanger implements
> Thanks John. I will try that.
> But I think the only problem is I wont be able to run restore jobs while
> backup is running - simultaneously. Am I right?
>
Only if the backup and restore are on the same volume. Otherwise
concurrency, multiple virtual drives will lessen the chance of that.
Also r
> Google search for bacula vchanger
>
> John
>
Thanks John. I will try that.
But I think the only problem is I wont be able to run restore jobs while
backup is running - simultaneously. Am I right?
--
Download Intel®
> You don't use RAID, so you don't need to secure the data storage, so why
> not trying LVM (maybe with GPT EFI)?
>
> You will have one bug partition, and no problem with multiple disks storage.
>
> But you will need to delete all data before installing a LVM.
>
That is much less reliable than the
Cyril Lavier wrote:
> Heitor Faria wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have a 12 tb disk array and I use the disks individually (since my
>> boss dont want to use RAID).
>> Each disk is a single storage for Bacula (but it makes addministration a
>> little bit complex).
>> Is there a way of using all disks
> I have a 12 tb disk array and I use the disks individually (since my
> boss dont want to use RAID).
I believe it is much better for your backups to use individual disks.
> Each disk is a single storage for Bacula (but it makes addministration a
> little bit complex).
> Is there a way of using a
Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a 12 tb disk array and I use the disks individually (since my
> boss dont want to use RAID).
> Each disk is a single storage for Bacula (but it makes addministration a
> little bit complex).
> Is there a way of using all disks volumes as a single Bacula
Hi folks,
I have a 12 tb disk array and I use the disks individually (since my
boss dont want to use RAID).
Each disk is a single storage for Bacula (but it makes addministration a
little bit complex).
Is there a way of using all disks volumes as a single Bacula storage?
I think it would be a ni
On Jan 26, 2008 5:28 PM, Paul Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're experimenting with bacula as possible replacement for our netvault
> setup. On the netvault server, we have multiple partitions that we can
> use for file-based "tapes". (This allows us to easily add arrays / space
> i
Hi,
We're experimenting with bacula as possible replacement for our netvault
setup. On the netvault server, we have multiple partitions that we can
use for file-based "tapes". (This allows us to easily add arrays / space
in case we need more; something a striped setup would not allow for
instance.
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 14:01, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:31, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> >> Dan Langille wrote:
> >>> On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> >>>
> Hello the list,
>
> I backup files on two disks: one for
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 14:01, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:31, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> >> Dan Langille wrote:
> >>> On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> >>>
> Hello the list,
>
> I backup files on two disks: one for
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:31, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
>>>
Hello the list,
I backup files on two disks: one for even weeks and one for odd weeks. I
mount disks on a unique mount p
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:31, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> >
> >> Hello the list,
> >>
> >> I backup files on two disks: one for even weeks and one for odd weeks. I
> >> mount disks on a unique mount point like "/backup"
>
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
>
>> Hello the list,
>>
>> I backup files on two disks: one for even weeks and one for odd weeks. I
>> mount disks on a unique mount point like "/backup"
>>
>> When I want to restore files, I need sometimes to have both mounted
On 28 Aug 2006 at 14:59, Philippe CHAUVAT wrote:
> Hello the list,
>
> I backup files on two disks: one for even weeks and one for odd weeks. I
> mount disks on a unique mount point like "/backup"
>
> When I want to restore files, I need sometimes to have both mounted...
> but on the same mount
Hello the list,
I backup files on two disks: one for even weeks and one for odd weeks. I
mount disks on a unique mount point like "/backup"
When I want to restore files, I need sometimes to have both mounted...
but on the same mount point.
Any idea to solve this ?
Best regards
Philippe
-
21 matches
Mail list logo
