sadface
Thanks for your time
On 06/02/2018 01:43 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> It is impossible.
>
> On 06/01/2018 01:43 PM, Steffen Schwebel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>> Do you know any way to query the database to get the same output as
>> bconsole "status client"?
>>
>> regards,
>>
It is impossible.
On 06/01/2018 01:43 PM, Steffen Schwebel wrote:
Hello,
thanks.
Do you know any way to query the database to get the same output as
bconsole "status client"?
regards,
Steffen
On 06/01/2018 11:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
status client and select clients from the
Hello,
thanks.
Do you know any way to query the database to get the same output as
bconsole "status client"?
regards,
Steffen
On 06/01/2018 11:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> status client and select clients from the catalog are two totally
> different commands. Their outputs are
Hello,
status client and select clients from the catalog are two totally
different commands. Their outputs are different and the way they work
are totaldifferent. So trying to compare them is not useful.
status client shows you clients to which the Director can connect at
that moment as
On 05/29/2018 01:29 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Okay, so your question is really: why are some (the majority) of the removed
> machines not detected as "orphaned" by dbcheck?
Yes :)
Why are there differences between bconsole and the database and what to
do about it
> I'll have to pass that one on
Yes, that is correct (it keeps a client if Client.ClientId = Job.ClientId for
some job).
__Martin
> On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:29:07 +0200, Tilman Schmidt said:
>
> Okay, so your question is really: why are some (the majority) of the removed
> machines not detected as "orphaned" by dbcheck?
>
Okay, so your question is really: why are some (the majority) of the removed
machines not detected as "orphaned" by dbcheck?
I'll have to pass that one on as I don't know about the inner workings of
dbcheck's orphaned clients check.
Perhaps it is not considering clients as orphaned as long as
Thanks for your response.
But Im not sure what to tell you.
The Mysql Table bacula.Client has ~100 more entires than the output from
bconsole.
These are mostly machines the got removed from the bacula COnfiguration
but linger on in the database.
I assume thats why the helper script dbcheck
You may want to have a look at the raw result of the two commands
mysql bacula -e "select * from Client" -ss
echo "status client" | bconsole
After saving both to files and massaging them a bit with sed or a
similar tool, you should be able to feed them to diff and find out where
the difference
Hello,
Ive been working with Bacula and see a discrepany I cant explain:
mysql bacula -e "select * from Client" -ss | wc -l
336
echo "status client" | bconsole | wc -l
241
I tried to use the dbcheck to correct this mismatch.
But that is showing me 16 orhpaned clients. It should close to a
10 matches
Mail list logo
