On Friday 04 November 2005 19:53, Ove Risberg wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 14:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
and after reading bacula mail lists,
Hello,
For any one interested in performance tuning, I have added documentation to
src/version.h in the current CVS for all the performance #defines that are
available. Also, you can also get valuable information by disabling Catalog
Updates using the Use Catalog = no directive in your pool.
with the tape. I did'nt get more
then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris.
Anybody can help?
-Original Message-
From: Ove Risberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:59 PM
To: Ribi Roland
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi
Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi,
I changed the MaximumNetworkBufferSize to 65536 in the file
and storage
daemon configuration and increased the MaximumBlockSize to
262144 in the
storage daemon configuration.
If you change the MaximumBlockSize
Ribi Roland wrote:
With spooling it takes arround 10-20min to spool data and write them down to
tape at 2MB/s. But the save of the attributes (writing to the catalog) needs
2h or more!
Looks like the catalog database is underperforming, although maybe 2h is
reasonable if you have millions of
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:33 AM
To: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi,
We have Solaris 10 Servers, 3x Sun V240, one of them is the
backup-server
with the storage deamon
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:01 PM
To: Ribi Roland
Cc: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:33 +0100, Ribi Roland wrote:
I think that there are 2 Problems, one
-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi,
We have Solaris 10 Servers, 3x Sun V240, one of them is the
backup-server
with the storage deamon and director the others are backed up
to the tape at
the backup-server.
The backup
: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:33 AM
To: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning
Hi,
We have Solaris 10 Servers, 3x Sun V240, one of them is the
backup-server
with the storage deamon and director the others are backed up
Ribi I also disableb gzip compression at the same time.
I'd disable gzip anyway, let the drive with it's dedicated compression
do the work. Also, make sure that on your Sun boxes you have the
Gigabit ethernet cards (if not using the onboard ones) in the 66mhz
PCI slots, and not the 33mhz ones.
Ribi If I enable gzip I have the same low speed (with or w/o
Ribi --enable-smartalloc).
Turn it off, let the drive do the work.
Yes, that is how I configured it now.
Ribi At the moment bacula runs fast enougth. The only problem to
Ribi solve is OS/Hardware related. My Tape runs at an
Hi,
I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some source code
I increased it from 300KB/s to 3MB/s when backuping the root filesystem.
After reading the mail lists I found out that I was not the first bacula
Hello,
On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some source code
I increased it from 300KB/s to 3MB/s when backuping the root filesystem.
After
What did you ultimately change on your site that might be of interest to
others on the list? I'd be interested to know. I'm not going to get 3
MB/s, since I have a drive that writes slower than that, but any ways to
boost performance would be interesting.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | |
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 14:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
On Friday 04 November 2005 12:31, Ove Risberg wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to get some decent performance in my bacula configuration
and after reading bacula mail lists, documentation and some source code
I increased it from
15 matches
Mail list logo
