On 7. apr. 2011, at 03.07, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
I guess it would be nice to have priorities separated per Storage...
2011/4/6 ewan.br...@stfc.ac.uk
You are right that no priority 10 jobs will get run while there are higher
priority (lower number) jobs running. To run jobs in
important ones at 5 minutes past
the hour and I believe they will maintain that order in the queue.
Cheers,
Ewan
-Original Message-
From: hymie! [mailto:hy...@lactose.homelinux.net]
Sent: 04 April 2011 15:26
To: bacula-users
Subject: [Bacula-users] Priority question
My bacula
...@lactose.homelinux.net]
Sent: 04 April 2011 15:26
To: bacula-users
Subject: [Bacula-users] Priority question
My bacula setup is improving, and I have you guys to thank for it, so
thank you.
I have two separate Storage resources, and each one has specific
backup jobs assigned to it, and (I think
My bacula setup is improving, and I have you guys to thank for it, so
thank you.
I have two separate Storage resources, and each one has specific
backup jobs assigned to it, and (I think) two jobs will run at a time,
one to each Storage.
I have a handful of jobs, and they have a handful of
