Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I get
an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool file
system is too small - is this assumption right?
To get a
I have no answer sorry, just more questions :)
How do you measure the performance?
Does the 10MB/s comes from the bacula job report?
regards.
Le 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg a crit:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have
Il 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg ha scritto:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too
Il 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg ha scritto:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job report.
@Marcello: No - very time the spool fs is full (or the maximum spool size per
job etc.) is reached the spool fs is despooled to tape. And that is where I
hope to get the advantage from: despooling
Il 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg ha scritto:
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job
report.
@Marcello: No - very time the spool fs is full (or the maximum spool
size per job etc.) is reached the spool fs is despooled to tape. And
that is where
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too small - is this assumption right?
Remember
Le 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg a écrit :
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job report.
At least in my reports the speed shown is the amount of data transferred
divided by the amount of time to complete the job.
For example I had a job which
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:36:08AM -0700, frank_sg wrote:
To get a bigger spool fs, there might be some options:
1) What is better: bigger spool fs or faster spool fs? So first option: 3,6
TB RAID0 with 12 SAS disks direct attatched vs second option: 2 or 3 120 GB
SSDs?
2) Does it make any
In the message dated: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:09:36 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Marcello Romani on
Re: [Bacula-users] Questions about spooling were:
= Il 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg ha scritto:
= Thanks fpr replying.
=
= @Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:06:47AM -0400, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
[A], while it should be close to [B]. The reason for
the decrease in performance is that bacula stops all
spooling as soon as it starts de-spooling.
In an ideal configuration,
11 matches
Mail list logo
