On Friday 18 March 2005 21:39, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Brennon Church wrote:
> > It sounds like the clone functionality would be perfect for what I'm
> > looking for. Any estimate on when 1.37 is expected to release?
>
> 1.37 is the developing version - it's available via cvs, but unless
On Friday 18 March 2005 21:09, Brennon Church wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > With version 1.37 as it currently stands, you can "clone" a job. That is
> > start up another job that will backup the same data (since the jobs run
> > separately, there may be minor differences). This means th
Brennon Church wrote:
Mike Reinehr wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:00 pm, Brennon Church wrote:
My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
pool to tape for off-site storage. It sounds like
Hello.
Brennon Church wrote:
It sounds like the clone functionality would be perfect for what I'm
looking for. Any estimate on when 1.37 is expected to release?
1.37 is the developing version - it's available via cvs, but unless
you're ready to spend some time on bug-hunting and getting it workin
Mike Reinehr wrote:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:00 pm, Brennon Church wrote:
>
>>My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
>>large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
>>pool to tape for off-site storage. It sounds like Bacula is not quite
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>
>
> With version 1.37 as it currently stands, you can "clone" a job. That is
> start
> up another job that will backup the same data (since the jobs run separately,
> there may be minor differences). This means that you can do your regular
> backup, and simultaneousl
On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:00 pm, Brennon Church wrote:
> My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
> large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
> pool to tape for off-site storage. It sounds like Bacula is not quite
> up to such a configura
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:21 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> The problem is that to the best of my knowledge no one besides me (and one
> other user -- see below) has ever used bcopy, and no one has ever asked how
> to use it, so I have not put much effort into ensuring that bcopy works
> correct
On Thursday 17 March 2005 22:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Brennon Church wrote:
> > Thanks for the response.
> >
> > My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
> > large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
> > pool to tape for off-site storage. I
Brennon Church wrote:
Thanks for the response.
My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
pool to tape for off-site storage. It sounds like Bacula is not quite
up to such a configuration yet.
Yet... ri
Thanks for the response.
My intention is actually to do my full and incremental backups to a
large RAID. Once a week, I wanted to copy the volumes from my full job
pool to tape for off-site storage. It sounds like Bacula is not quite
up to such a configuration yet.
Another option would have bee
11 matches
Mail list logo
