Kern Sibbald schrieb:
So, it sounds like your performance problems were resolved by the upgrade if I
understand correctly.
I just want to see this working more than once... ;-)
By the way, please don't try to run simultaneous jobs in the same FD if you
use the new VSS feature -- it will not
On Friday 22 July 2005 17:18, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:00, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> >
> > Unlikely, but I would be happy if someone tried.
>
> I did install 1.37.30 and changed the following of the configuration
> addtionally:
> * switche
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:00, Carsten Schurig wrote:
Unlikely, but I would be happy if someone tried.
I did install 1.37.30 and changed the following of the configuration
addtionally:
* switched from sqlite to mysql
* use my 2 DDS-3 drives as single o
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:58, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > Unlikely, but I would be happy if someone tried.
>
> Is the binary windows version available on SF (1.37.22) compatible to
> the current Linux version 1.37.25? The release notes say, that there's a
> new communicati
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
Unlikely, but I would be happy if someone tried.
Is the binary windows version available on SF (1.37.22) compatible to
the current Linux version 1.37.25? The release notes say, that there's a
new communication protocol so that all clients need to be updated to
1.37.25.
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
Recently a user reported serious performance problems and stalled backups. The
bottom line was a NVidia ethernet card with an old driver. See the Win32
chapter of the development manual for more details.
I can almost definetly say, that this shouldn't be the problem in
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 13:29, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:00, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> > Dominic Marks schrieb:
> > > The problem is that the client system is not sending data fast
> > > enough, so I don't see how spooling will help. I also have this
> > >
> > > problem,
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:00, Carsten Schurig wrote:
> Dominic Marks schrieb:
> > The problem is that the client system is not sending data fast
> > enough, so I don't see how spooling will help. I also have this
> >
> > problem, some Windows machines can manange ~1MB/s. One laptop
> >
> > in p
Dominic Marks schrieb:
The problem is that the client system is not sending data fast
enough, so I don't see how spooling will help. I also have this
> problem, some Windows machines can manange ~1MB/s. One laptop
in particular running WindowsXP can do no better than 50KB/s when
And I don't
Jonas Björklund schrieb:
Have you tried spooling?
Doesn't change anything. And then I wouldn't expect, that
a) the performance of a linux client is 8x better,
b) I got a similar performance from the windows machine before.
I did even test portable mode, but that doesn't change anything eithe
10 matches
Mail list logo
