Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Tape marked used but not the oldest volume.

2016-09-23 Thread Marcin Haba
Hello Gi Dot, I think that this problem and solution to the problem is very similar to that we solved yesterday here: https://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2016-09/msg8.html I don't mean the same technical solution but only analogy to use a workarround and its consequences. You

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Tape marked used but not the oldest volume.

2016-09-12 Thread Gi Dot
Sorry I forgot to mention that I want a solution that doesn't require human intervention. I used to use a script to set the volume status to recycle after each job run but I figured that maybe there's a better way of doing it? My aim is so that the backup job will always be successful, regardless

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Tape marked used but not the oldest volume.

2016-09-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/12/16 06:14, Gi Dot wrote: > Hi list, > > If I have a list of tapes with status Used, and the tape that I inserted > is also Used and the retention period is already exceeded, bacula won't > recycle the tape if it is not the oldest volume, right? > > If the prior statement is true, is it

[Bacula-users] Recycle Tape marked used but not the oldest volume.

2016-09-12 Thread Gi Dot
Hi list, If I have a list of tapes with status Used, and the tape that I inserted is also Used and the retention period is already exceeded, bacula won't recycle the tape if it is not the oldest volume, right? If the prior statement is true, is it possible for me to get bacula to recycle a tape