Em 03-02-2012 20:35, John Drescher escreveu:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Diego Rubertdprub...@prms.mpf.gov.br wrote:
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
all jobs and files
Em 06-02-2012 14:12, Martin Simmons escreveu:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention period expires
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:13:30 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
Em 06-02-2012 14:12, Martin Simmons escreveu:
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
all jobs and files from volume, it should respect volume retention,
don't it?
For
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Diego Rubert dprub...@prms.mpf.gov.br wrote:
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
all
