Re: [Bacula-users] Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

2007-02-07 Thread John Drescher
> Bacula sends the data directly from the filedaemon on each client to > the storage daemon with out going through the director (main bacula > server). > I wanted to clarify one thing. The storage daemon is run on the machine that holds the tape drive. As a result of this design I believe bacula do

Re: [Bacula-users] Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

2007-02-07 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, John Drescher wrote: > Bacula sends the data directly from the filedaemon on each client to > the storage daemon with out going through the director (main bacula > server). If network speed is an issue, one can always configure IP-over-san... ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

2007-02-06 Thread Alan Davis
rigid schedule, inability to multiplex backups to optimize tape use and backup windows and the code was, as is typical of production software, 80% error checking and management. >Message: 7 >Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:35:17 +1100 >From: Alan O'Keefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sub

Re: [Bacula-users] Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

2007-02-06 Thread John Drescher
On 2/6/07, Alan O'Keefe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > I have a situation where we have a single tape library, (IBM 3581 > Ultrium Tape Loader), which is connected via a fibre SAN to a mix of > Intel Blade's, (running RH Linux or Win 2K), and a couple of P570 > servers running AIX. I am t

[Bacula-users] Single tape drive visible to multiple hosts

2007-02-06 Thread Alan O'Keefe
Hi all I have a situation where we have a single tape library, (IBM 3581 Ultrium Tape Loader), which is connected via a fibre SAN to a mix of Intel Blade's, (running RH Linux or Win 2K), and a couple of P570 servers running AIX. I am trying to put together a multi-platform backup strategy and