Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> I've enabled hardware compression and throughput speed has improved to
> around 80MB/sec which is better but still not fantastic. It is coming
> off disk at around 90-100MB/sec so the diffence must be partly down to
> the hw compression.
On my LTO4 I see variations in
Hi Richard
On 16/07/10, richard (rich...@sauce.co.nz) wrote:
> Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> > Currently I'm getting a throughput of around 10MB/sec to tape, which
> > seems pretty low. iotop is showing reading off disk at around
> > 17-20MB/sec and one of the 8 cores on this Xeon E5520 (2267MHz
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Currently I'm getting a throughput of around 10MB/sec to tape, which
> seems pretty low. iotop is showing reading off disk at around
> 17-20MB/sec and one of the 8 cores on this Xeon E5520 (2267MHz) is
> running at 100%. Hardware compression is disabled on the tape cha
Hi. I'm busy writing a test 3TB volume off fairly slow storage on a
local machine to a SAS connected DELL PV-124T tape changer with 1 drive
and (I think) 8 slots. The local storage should be able to sustain well
over 100MB/s reads.
I'm running my test backup with GZIP compression enabled.
Current
anks for your answer!
>
> i. A. Christoff Buch
>
> =
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +49.941.78004.607
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> OneVision Software AG
> Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 9
> D - 93049 Regensburg
>
>
>
> "Thors
07
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OneVision Software AG
Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 9
D - 93049 Regensburg
"Thorsten Engel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16.06.2006 21:30
To
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
[Bacula-users] Throughput
Dear Christoff,
I reached 17MB/s o
Dear Christoff,
I reached 17MB/s on a brand new linux server (xeon, fd,dir and sd on 1
machine). I surely can say that the current fd on win32 is not optimal
(using almost 100% of the cpu). The next release will include an optimized
version. What OS are you using? How much cpu is bacula consuming
