Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade to 1.38.0 and tape usage goes from 5 to 3

2005-11-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 10:52, Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote: One think I spotted. It said is *wasn't* backing up /data due to file system change, but you are specifically asking to back up /data. I suspect this also may be your lost data. Worth a check. If he explicitly asked it

[Bacula-users] Upgrade to 1.38.0 and tape usage goes from 5 to 3

2005-11-07 Thread Jesse Keating
Before upgrading, I was using a 1.36 release. My weekly tape usage was around 5 100g tapes (compression was supposed to be in use at the hardware level). After upgrading to 1.38.0 my usage is now at 3 tapes. This obviously concerns me, I don't want to be missing data from my backups. Is this

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade to 1.38.0 and tape usage goes from 5 to 3

2005-11-07 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Any thoughts? Whoops. I see now that I had one of my larger jobs commented out due to a server re-install. Fixed, and this may bring me back up to 5 tapes. -- Jesse Keating GameHouse -- Systems Engineer

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade to 1.38.0 and tape usage goes from 5 to 3

2005-11-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 07 November 2005 19:48, Jesse Keating wrote: Before upgrading, I was using a 1.36 release. My weekly tape usage was around 5 100g tapes (compression was supposed to be in use at the hardware level). After upgrading to 1.38.0 my usage is now at 3 tapes. This obviously concerns me, I