Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> If I remember correctly, Kern in the 2.2.7 announce have set the
> possibility to log client with certifcates (as we can do in PKI )
More specifically, it was the ability to use TLS authentication without TLS
encryption of the entire session. TLS authentication and encry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the
> internet.
>
> I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this
> solution strong enough ? Is there a more secure solution ?
>
> It is possible to use ssh tun
Terry L. Inzauro wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the
>>> internet.
>>>
>>> I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this
>>> solution strong enough ?
>> "Str
Dan Langille wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the
>> internet.
>>
>> I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this
>> solution strong enough ?
>
> "Strong-enough" is hard to define.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the
> internet.
>
> I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this
> solution strong enough ?
"Strong-enough" is hard to define. It is at least as strong as htt
Hello
I wish to know what is the most secure solution for using bacula over the
internet.
I have seen bacula is able to use tls connection and tcp-wrappers. Is this
solution strong enough ? Is there a more secure solution ?
It is possible to use ssh tunnel, but it is really painfull to administr