Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Sorry, actually the Volume is marked as Full, not Used as I posted before... thanks... 2011/1/18 Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com Hello everyone.. I'm currently using, in my Tape Storage, LTO-4 Tapes (800Gb each). I had a Volume on a specific Pool with already 100G of space used

[Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello everyone.. I'm currently using, in my Tape Storage, LTO-4 Tapes (800Gb each). I had a Volume on a specific Pool with already 100G of space used by previous Full backups. After that, I started a Full Backup job on the same Pool, which ended up using the same Volume (no problem there). Since

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Timo Neuvonen
Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä news:AANLkTi=vLBszk=7e9f7aoeeqssny6b2vhacvrfqci...@mail.gmail.com... Sorry, actually the Volume is marked as Full, not Used as I posted before... thanks... 2011/1/18 Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com Hello

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Yeah, thats exactly what I did, the other volume I could save (I purged it), but since I'm running short on Tapes here, I just wondered if there was a way to save that space on the first volume... The logic about concurrent Jobs is absolutely right, but since I KNOW that there was only one Job on