On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 15:36, Alan Brown wrote:
>>
>> Nothing major here.
>>
>> Kern:
>>
>> When doing a 'status storage' it would be extremely handy to know
>> whether jobs are:
>>
>> 1: spooling to disk
>> 2: flushing the spool
>> 3: waiting to flush
On Friday 14 July 2006 15:36, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> Nothing major here.
>
> Kern:
>
> When doing a 'status storage' it would be extremely handy to know
> whether jobs are:
>
> 1: spooling to disk
> 2: flushing the spool
> 3: waiting to flush
>
> This is only applicable when spooling is ena
Nothing major here.
Kern:
When doing a 'status storage' it would be extremely handy to know
whether jobs are:
1: spooling to disk
2: flushing the spool
3: waiting to flush
This is only applicable when spooling is enabled (of course).
How hard would this be to implement?
I had 20 jobs run
