* Rob Gerber [2024-07-04 14:45:43 -0500]:
> I don't know if that would work since I haven't used the old 9.6x bacula
> binaries. I do see that the client is only a tiny bit newer than the
> server. Personally, I suspect that if the server checks versions, it will
> refuse to work.
The difference i
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 18:56, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
> I'm considering connecting:
>
> bacula client 9.6.7-7 Debian:12.6/stable (the latest version for Debian 12)
>
> to
>
> bacula server 9.6.7-3 Debian:11.6/oldstable (the latest version for
> Debian 11)
>
Exactly the same setup works for me.
Che
On 05/07/2024 03:53, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
I'm considering connecting:
bacula client 9.6.7-7 Debian:12.6/stable (the latest version for Debian 12)
to
bacula server 9.6.7-3 Debian:11.6/oldstable (the latest version for
Debian 11)
From what I understand, client version should always be <= se
I don't know if that would work since I haven't used the old 9.6x bacula
binaries. I do see that the client is only a tiny bit newer than the
server. Personally, I suspect that if the server checks versions, it will
refuse to work. Maybe try to see if a slightly older version of the client
is avail
I'm considering connecting:
bacula client 9.6.7-7 Debian:12.6/stable (the latest version for Debian 12)
to
bacula server 9.6.7-3 Debian:11.6/oldstable (the latest version for
Debian 11)
From what I understand, client version should always be <= server
version but perhaps the above would be
