Hi Sebastian,
Sorry for this late response...
So I guess I managed to solve my problems.
Probably obvious for any Bacula expert, but here's what I did :
I listed the files of the last good job before "redundant jobs" occur, and
all following jobs.
I tried to identify what Job I could delete (bec
Hello Samuel,
I also wrote my answer under the text-blocks and summarized it at the end, to
get it a little bit clearer, because the email is a little bit lengthy. If you
want to answer to this you can leave everthing out except the summarization.
That should get the email way shorter again an m
Hi Sebastian,
My answers below.
Thanks once again for your help !
Samuel
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 02:23, a écrit :
> >
> > I mean that my goal is to save any new file, once and permanently.
> > If monday I have file1 on my nas, I want it to be saved on tape.
> > Tuesday I add file2 : I want it
>
> I mean that my goal is to save any new file, once and permanently.
> If monday I have file1 on my nas, I want it to be saved on tape.
> Tuesday I add file2 : I want it to be saved on tape.
> Wednesday, file1 is deleted from NAS: it's a mistake, and I still want to
> keep file1 forever on t
Hi Sebastian !
Thanks a lot for your answer !
I'll try to answer myself the best I can.
Please see my answers below.
Thanks again, and take care,
Samuel
Le mar. 28 sept. 2021 à 16:01, a écrit :
> Am 27-Sep-2021 11:46:31 +0200 schrieb s...@w4tch.tv:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Anyone coul
Am 27-Sep-2021 11:46:31 +0200 schrieb s...@w4tch.tv:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Anyone could help me here ?
>
> Thanks a lot !
>
> Samuel
>
> Le jeu. 23 sept. 2021 à 12:46, Samuel Zaslavsky a écrit :
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> > We have set up a system with a tape library and Bacula to back up /
Hello everyone,
Anyone could help me here ?
Thanks a lot !
Samuel
Le jeu. 23 sept. 2021 à 12:46, Samuel Zaslavsky a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have set up a system with a tape library and Bacula to back up /
> archive some NASs. The idea is as simple as possible: no files expire, I
>
Hello everyone,
We have set up a system with a tape library and Bacula to back up /
archive some
NASs. The idea is as simple as possible: no files expire, I just have to
make sure that in the event of a disaster on a NAS, we will be able to
recover all the files.
(So I have a pretty basic knowledg
Op 14/04/2011 9:55, Graham Keeling schreef:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:48:37AM +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, ruslan usifov wrote:
>>
>>> I'm new in bacula world so have a question:
>>>
>>> If i do incremental backup. For example veri big file change only few byte
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:48:37AM +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, ruslan usifov wrote:
>
> > I'm new in bacula world so have a question:
> >
> > If i do incremental backup. For example veri big file change only few bytes
> > i it, what bacula do send all file, or on
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +0400, ruslan usifov wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm new in bacula world so have a question:
>
> If i do incremental backup. For example veri big file change only few bytes
> i it, what bacula do send all file, or only changed part of file?
Bacula will send the whole fi
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, ruslan usifov wrote:
> I'm new in bacula world so have a question:
>
> If i do incremental backup. For example veri big file change only few bytes
> i it, what bacula do send all file, or only changed part of file?
It backs up the whole file each time a single byte or m
Hello
I'm new in bacula world so have a question:
If i do incremental backup. For example veri big file change only few bytes
i it, what bacula do send all file, or only changed part of file?
--
Benefiting from Server Vir
On Friday 24 December 2010 15:54:53 Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Friday 24 December 2010 15:22:14 James Harper wrote:
> > >
> > > I started backing up an Exchange 2003 on a 32-bit Windows Server 2003
> > SP2
> > > (SBS).
> > >
> > > The full backup completes OK, but incrementals fail with error
> >
On Friday 24 December 2010 15:22:14 James Harper wrote:
> >
> > I started backing up an Exchange 2003 on a 32-bit Windows Server 2003
> SP2
> > (SBS).
> >
> > The full backup completes OK, but incrementals fail with error
> "0xc800020e".
>
> That message is "An incremental backup cannot be perfo
>
> I started backing up an Exchange 2003 on a 32-bit Windows Server 2003
SP2
> (SBS).
>
> The full backup completes OK, but incrementals fail with error
"0xc800020e".
That message is "An incremental backup cannot be performed when circular
logging is enabled.". There should be a message in the
Hi.
I started backing up an Exchange 2003 on a 32-bit Windows Server 2003 SP2 (SBS).
The full backup completes OK, but incrementals fail with error "0xc800020e".
Some things I did after digging into it:
- disabled circular logging on Exchange - do I have to restart something
after doing it?
See accurate option on job properties.
http://www.bacula.org/manuals/en/concepts/concepts/New_Features.html#SECTION0031
Kleber
2010/11/24 Paulo Martinez
> Am 24.11.2010 um 13:54 schrieb Ralf Gross:
> > Paulo Martinez schrieb:
> >> One thing that i found interesting: the "moved"
Am 24.11.2010 um 13:54 schrieb Ralf Gross:
> Paulo Martinez schrieb:
>> One thing that i found interesting: the "moved" files respectively
>> the old locations are listed in the bacula job file list. Restoring
>> corresponding locations shows correct behavior (moved file vanished).
>> ...
>
> http:
Paulo Martinez schrieb:
> One thing that i found interesting: the "moved" files respectively
> the old locations are listed in the bacula job file list. Restoring
> corresponding locations shows correct behavior (moved file vanished).
> ...
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1651
The developers c
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:15:11 +0100, Paulo Martinez said:
>
> One thing that i found interesting: the "moved" files respectively
> the old locations are listed in the bacula job file list. Restoring
> corresponding locations shows correct behavior (moved file vanished).
Yes, it records the m
Am 23.11.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Martin Simmons:
>>
>> i started using bacula a couple of weeks ago and i am very satisfied.
>>
>> Today i noticed on doing an incremental backup that a file that was
>> moved
>> from one directory to another doesn't get stored in the backup?
>>
>> After doing a "touch
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:15:17 +0100, martinezino said:
>
> Dear List,
>
> i started using bacula a couple of weeks ago and i am very satisfied.
>
> Today i noticed on doing an incremental backup that a file that was
> moved
> from one directory to another doesn't get stored in the backup
Dear List,
i started using bacula a couple of weeks ago and i am very satisfied.
Today i noticed on doing an incremental backup that a file that was
moved
from one directory to another doesn't get stored in the backup?
After doing a "touch" on the file - it got saved into the backup
(increme
Hi,
This could be for many reasons:
* A software accessing the file for indexing or storing info about it change
the time of the file, then Bacula archive it for next Incremental.
* An error in windows clock make the photo will be in the future, then
bacula archive it for the next Incremental.
*
Hi,
My bacula server is doing incremental backups from remote users (Windows
or Linux) and is saving files that have not been modified from last
incremental backup (one day before).
For example:
list files jobid=16350
+
Hi all again,
SOLVED, SOLVED, SOLVED.
I found many files "in future". I located with find linux command.
find /home -mtime -0
To reset the modification time for files I use find command too...
find /home -mtime -0 -exec touch {} \;
Running the job twice, the second has no files to backup.
My in
Hi all,
I have a bacula 5.0.2 in a production environment and a unexpected situation
has occurred with incremental backup.
Exists a job named Backup-ARQUIVOS with a samba file server running on
CentOS. My schedule run a Full backup at 1st sun of month and a Incremental
backup daily.
The problem i
Hi,
I've ntoiced problem in the way Bacula is doing incremental backup. I have
one folder to backup and in this folder database is writing log files, I
have new file in every few minutes.
Previous incremental backup ended at 11:07 am. The next incremental backup
started 13:05 so in folder it had l
On 04/28/2009 13:06, stipe wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have this problem: I have 1 PC Windows XP SP2 (bacula-win 2.4.5) and a
> bacula server (centos 5.2). I setup a full backup every month and incremental
> the other days. So I made some tests and I run backup manually: the problem
> in this: the first b
Hello,
> How do you add those files? Copy them using the shell/cmd, moving them
> using the explorer, creating them with an application and saving to
> the folder in question?
>
I moved my files and folder with explorer (cut and paste)
> ...
As you can see bacula said: "Termination: Ba
Hello,
28.04.2009 19:06, stipe wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have this problem: I have 1 PC Windows XP SP2 (bacula-win 2.4.5)
> and a bacula server (centos 5.2). I setup a full backup every month
> and incremental the other days. So I made some tests and I run
> backup manually: the problem in this: the firs
Hi
I have this problem: I have 1 PC Windows XP SP2 (bacula-win 2.4.5) and a bacula
server (centos 5.2). I setup a full backup every month and incremental the
other days. So I made some tests and I run backup manually: the problem in
this: the first backup (Full) is ok, then I add some files a
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 11:37, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Ingo Jochim schrieb am 16.01.08 um 17:39 Uhr:
>
> [...]
>
> > Good idea.
> > So what is important for the backup? ctime or mtime?
>
> Both. But you can configure bacula to ignore the ctime.
See Configuring the Director/The Job Resourc
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:39:58 +0100, Ingo Jochim said:
>
> C M Reinehr schrieb:
> > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote:
> >
> >> C M Reinehr schrieb:
> >>
> >>> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote:
> >>>
> Dan Langille schrieb:
>
* Ingo Jochim schrieb am 16.01.08 um 17:39 Uhr:
[...]
>
> Good idea.
> So what is important for the backup? ctime or mtime?
Both. But you can configure bacula to ignore the ctime.
-Marc
> I't not able to reset the ctime.
> How can I have ls give me the time format I will need for touch to res
Ingo Jochim wrote:
> I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do
> the backup the files can get deleted by someone else.
>
> The problem is that on an incremental backup I get a backup of all the
> files again like I got on a full backup.
> I create all the hard links r
I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do
the backup the files can get deleted by someone else.
The problem is that on an incremental backup I get a backup of all the
files again like I got on a full backup.
I create all the hard links right before the backup. A hard
Many thanks. This was it. The svn database backup script did a chmod
-R at the end which caused everything to be backed up again.
On 7/16/07, Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Steve Poulsen wrote:
>
> > I have one directory that continues to show up in all of my increm
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Steve Poulsen wrote:
> I have one directory that continues to show up in all of my incremental
> /differential backup, even if the files have not changed.
> # ls -al
> drw--- 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 04:05 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 5 19:38 ..
> -r
Arno,
Many thanks. ctime is getting updated. There is an "Application specific
backup" for SVN on the website (indirectly), which does a chmod -R after it
is done. It kind of defeats the whole purpose of the script. Anyway,
removing it should solve the problem.
Steve
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi
Many thanks. ctime is getting modified. I will check into this.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 16.07.2007 14:15,, Steve Poulsen wrote::
>
>> I have one directory that continues to show up in all of my incremental
>> /differential backup, even if the files have not changed.
>> # ls -al
>> drw-
Hi,
16.07.2007 14:15,, Steve Poulsen wrote::
> I have one directory that continues to show up in all of my incremental
> /differential backup, even if the files have not changed.
> # ls -al
> drw--- 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 04:05 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 5 19:38 ..
I have one directory that continues to show up in all of my incremental
/differential backup, even if the files have not changed.
# ls -al
drw--- 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 04:05 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 5 19:38 ..
-rw--- 1 root root 111076 Jul 5 19:46 common.
Hi,
29.06.2007 19:26,, Naufal Sheikh wrote::
> Hey,
>
> Sorry for not reading the archive first, but the change which has been
> suggested is still not working for me, and I am not sure why.
IIRC, the first time after adding the "Ignore Fileset Changes"
directive, the job will be upgraded bec
Hey,
Sorry for not reading the archive first, but the change which has been
suggested is still not working for me, and I am not sure why. Here is my
file set:
FileSet {
Name = "tracfire-fileset"
Ignore FileSet Changes = "yes"
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
}
File = /
Yep I did the full restart as well as reload
Regards
On 6/29/07, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you restart/reload the Bacula daemons? I'm not sure which daemon
this change takes effect in (I'm assuming director, but if it isn't,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you restart/reload the Bacula daemons? I'm not sure which daemon
this change takes effect in (I'm assuming director, but if it isn't, it
needs a full restart).
What do you see when it gets upgraded anyway?
Naufal Sheikh wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Sorry
The subject is : Modifying Fileset changes incr to Full
2007/6/28, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Please read the list archives. This was discussed no earlier than this
> weekend (and in fact, some of the messages were from today).
>
> N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please read the list archives. This was discussed no earlier than this
weekend (and in fact, some of the messages were from today).
Naufal Sheikh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know that incremental backup upgrades to full backup, if another file
> system is
Hi All,
I know that incremental backup upgrades to full backup, if another file
system is added to a file set. The disadvantage of the scheme being, that I
will have to take a full backup before schedule which disrupts other backup
schedules. Is there anyway to avoid this and let bacula take the
On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:03, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> >> Hey there,
> >>
> >> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
> >> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 Jun
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
>> Hey there,
>>
>> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
>> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
>>
>> We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6
On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:20, Rudolph Bott wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
> a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
>
> We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6 different storages
> (from
Hey there,
we redid our schedule to include incremental backups and we seem to have
a bit of problem here (bacula Version: 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) )
We use file-backed backups and we have configured 6 different storages
(from monday to saturday):
Device "StorageMontag" (/bacula/montag/montag-XX
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:53:47 +0100, Michel said:
>
> I read in the bacula docs that incremental backups use modification
> times to decide if it or doesn't backup. For example and as it is said
> in the doc, a "mv" on a directory doesn't change the modification time.
> So, if I am not w
On 11/15/06, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I read in the bacula docs that incremental backups use modification
> times to decide if it or doesn't backup. For example and as it is said
> in the doc, a "mv" on a directory doesn't change the modification time.
> So, if I am not w
Hello all,
I read in the bacula docs that incremental backups use modification
times to decide if it or doesn't backup. For example and as it is said
in the doc, a "mv" on a directory doesn't change the modification time.
So, if I am not wrong, incremental backup are not accurate?
If this is
>you have to increase the Volume numbers
I thought this setup created new volumes "as needed"?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Sorry, something weird happened to my log-paste. Here is a correct version!
16-Aug 12:17 cookiemonster-dir: No prior Full backup Job record found.
16-Aug 12:17 cookiemonster-dir: No prior or suitable Full backup found.
Doing FULL backup.
16-Aug 12:17 cookiemonster-dir: Start Backup JobId 20,
Job=
>
>I think a "list media" whould clarrify more, your setup.
Appended at the bottom.
>But with list media and the comparsion of the VolumenRetention-times you
>probably see the problem yourself.
Well, yes, but I do not understand what I need to change.
I want a full backup once per week, and
I have a Full/incremental setup in place, but most days, it gets updated to
"full" backup. How can I find out _why_ this is happening, since I am now
using way more disk space then planned? It seem to run "incremental" only as
long as the job is done on the same day as the "full", and do a new "ful
62 matches
Mail list logo
