On 2/14/2011 7:25 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 2/14/2011 4:52 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote:
In summary, Dir and FD need to be at the same version, FD version should be
really close if you want to be sure you can use newer features, bug
fixes, etc.
Did you mean Dir and SD? Dir and SD must be a the
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more informative than just a big blank window like
it is in 3.0.1. :)
don't know
On 2/14/2011 4:52 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote:
In summary, Dir and FD need to be at the same version, FD version should be
really close if you want to be sure you can use newer features, bug fixes,
etc.
Did you mean Dir and SD? Dir and SD must be a the same level. FD can
lag behind. In short:
Ever tried colinux in this configuration?
Sent from my iPhone
On 10/02/2011, at 18:43, Randy Katz rk...@simplicityhosting.com wrote:
On 2/9/2011 3:49 PM, Jeff Shanholtz wrote:
I see that server support has been pulled from the installer. I
have 3.0.1 installed and configured on
On 2/9/2011 11:40 PM, Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/02/2011 08:14, Ralf Gross ha scritto:
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more
Il 10/02/2011 09:00, Randy Katz ha scritto:
On 2/9/2011 11:40 PM, Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 10/02/2011 08:14, Ralf Gross ha scritto:
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can
upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that
Il 10/02/2011 08:59, James Harper ha scritto:
Ever tried colinux in this configuration?
http://www.colinux.org
Amazing!
Although I don't see why bother running a stable OS under an unstable
one instead of the other way around... :-)
--
Marcello Romani
Il 10/02/2011 08:59, James Harper ha scritto:
Ever tried colinux in this configuration?
http://www.colinux.org
Amazing!
Although I don't see why bother running a stable OS under an unstable
one instead of the other way around... :-)
If you're already running windows in the first
[mailto:james.har...@bendigoit.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:45 AM
To: Marcello Romani; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] no upgrade path for windows servers?
Il 10/02/2011 08:59, James Harper ha scritto:
Ever tried colinux in this configuration?
http
I see that server support has been pulled from the installer. I have 3.0.1
installed and configured on my windows 2003 server and it is working great.
Even though there isn't an installer for this configuration, is it possible
to manually replace my 3.0.1 binaries with 5.0.3 binaries for storage
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more informative than just a big blank window like
it is in 3.0.1. :)
don't know about the
On 2/9/2011 3:49 PM, Jeff Shanholtz wrote:
I see that server support has been pulled from the installer. I have
3.0.1 installed and configured on my windows 2003 server and it is
working great. Even though there isn't an installer for this
configuration, is it possible to manually replace my
Il 10/02/2011 08:14, Ralf Gross ha scritto:
Jeff Shanholtz schrieb:
...
Finally, I assume that if I stay with 3.0.1 on the server, I can upgrade
clients to 5.0.3, correct? I'm crossing my fingers that the client status
window will be a little more informative than just a big blank window like
13 matches
Mail list logo
