Re: [Bacula-users] recover partial readable tape

2009-03-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.03.2009 19:07, Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> Is there a way to "reassemble" the two parts of the file and reread >>> them with bacula? i've not found any option like "skip file 4 to 20" >>> with the bextract,bscan,bls tools >> You should use a bootstrap file to that purpose. The easiest way wou

Re: [Bacula-users] recover partial readable tape

2009-03-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
>> >> Is there a way to "reassemble" the two parts of the file and reread >> them with bacula? i've not found any option like "skip file 4 to 20" >> with the bextract,bscan,bls tools > > You should use a bootstrap file to that purpose. The easiest way would > be to initiate a restore from the co

Re: [Bacula-users] recover partial readable tape

2009-03-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.03.2009 17:01, Thomas Mueller wrote: > hi > > i've found out, that the error on tape is between file 4 and 20. i can > successfull forward space to file 20 ("mt -f /dev/nst0 20"). Good start. > reading from file 0 with "dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/null bs=64512" works > until file 4 and

[Bacula-users] recover partial readable tape (was: I/O error with quantum lto-4)

2009-03-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
hi i've found out, that the error on tape is between file 4 and 20. i can successfull forward space to file 20 ("mt -f /dev/nst0 20"). reading from file 0 with "dd if=/dev/nst0 of=/dev/null bs=64512" works until file 4 and 235MB. Is there a way to "reassemble" the two parts of the file and