On 12/05/2014 02:11 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 13:57, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does
Hello,
2014-12-05 20:01 GMT+01:00 Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.pro:
On 05/12/14 19:20, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 12/05/2014 07:48 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
The purpose of such a checksum wouldn't be to prove that the
tapes are correct, it would simply be to catch any failure of the
spool
On 06/12/14 00:02, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/05):
Now it is in the bug tracker:
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2111
... Data corruption occurs on disks sometimes, e.g. the write to disk
didn't record data correctly on the platter and any attempt to read
it
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more
On 05/12/14 13:57, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before
On 12/5/2014 8:11 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 13:57, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does
On 05/12/14 14:25, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 8:11 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 13:57, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014
On 05/12/14 14:48, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 14:25, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 8:11 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 13:57, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 12/5/2014 1:03 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14
On 12/05/2014 07:48 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
The purpose of such a checksum wouldn't be to prove that the tapes are
correct, it would simply be to catch any failure of the spool disk at
the earliest opportunity
Monitoring your hardware is not bacula's job. Appropriate tools for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/12/14 19:20, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 12/05/2014 07:48 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
The purpose of such a checksum wouldn't be to prove that the
tapes are correct, it would simply be to catch any failure of the
spool disk at the earliest
On 12/05/2014 01:01 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
smartctl and fsck will not always know if bits are written incorrectly
within the data of a file.
Buy better disks, then.
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/05):
Now it is in the bug tracker:
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2111
... Data corruption occurs on disks sometimes, e.g. the write to disk
didn't record data correctly on the platter and any attempt to read
it returns the corrupted data. This may just be 1 bit
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more explicit, if there is a single bit error on the spool disk,
will it be noticed before going onto tape or would it only be noticed in
future when a file is taken
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more explicit, if there is a single bit error on the spool disk,
will it be noticed before going onto tape or would it only be
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more explicit, if there is a single bit error on the spool disk,
will it be noticed
On 05/12/14 00:43, Cejka Rudolf wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote (2014/12/04):
On 04/12/14 18:35, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On 12/03/2014 08:49 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more explicit, if there is a single bit error on the
Does Bacula checksum content on the spool disk before sending it to tape?
To be more explicit, if there is a single bit error on the spool disk,
will it be noticed before going onto tape or would it only be noticed in
future when a file is taken off the tape?
17 matches
Mail list logo
